Hi Collin,
> Perhaps test-sys_un{.c,cc} like usual
> and another test program for UNIX socket functionality if or
> is found.
Yes.
> I'm thinking that for older versions of Windows and systems without UNIX
> sockets they should all be skipped.
>
> I don't think there is much point in defining
Hi Bruno,
Bruno Haible writes:
> And a unit test would be nice as well. You know, it's only through the
> unit tests that we discover the portability problems.
>
> I think such a unit test shouldn't use fork(), like tests/test-passfd.c
> does, since fork() doesn't exist on native Windows. But
>
Hi Collin,
> I'll write a sys_un module to deal with including afunix.h tomorrow.
Nice!
And a unit test would be nice as well. You know, it's only through the
unit tests that we discover the portability problems.
I think such a unit test shouldn't use fork(), like tests/test-passfd.c
does, sinc
