>>> Would WOE32_NATIVE be a better name?
>>
>> Many people believe code should be neutral.
OK, but WIN32_NATIVE isn't neutral either; it connotes "win".
> How about W32_NATIVE then? I believe that some other GNU code
> uses w32 as a "32-bit Windows" prefix.
That'd be OK.
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Paul Eggert wrote:
>> > In other places I used to define WIN32 as an abbreviation of
>> > defined _WIN32 || defined __WIN32__
>> > Now I'm renaming that to WIN32_NATIVE.
>>
>> Would WOE32_NATIVE be a better name?
>
> Many people believe code should b
Paul Eggert wrote:
> > In other places I used to define WIN32 as an abbreviation of
> > defined _WIN32 || defined __WIN32__
> > Now I'm renaming that to WIN32_NATIVE.
>
> Would WOE32_NATIVE be a better name?
I don't know. I use the term "Woe32" when I talk about the platform which is
not a wi
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In other places I used to define WIN32 as an abbreviation of
> defined _WIN32 || defined __WIN32__
> Now I'm renaming that to WIN32_NATIVE.
Would WOE32_NATIVE be a better name?
