Re: `count-one-bits' -> LGPLv2+

Hi, Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As author, you are entitled to make that change. And I agree that > count-one-bits is library quality (since it can often be a thin wrapper > around a special assembly instruction). So I went ahead and pushed this > commit: Thanks! Ludo'.

Re: `count-one-bits' -> LGPLv2+

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Ben Pfaff on 8/22/2008 9:56 AM: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Would you be OK to relicense `count-one-bits' under LGPLv2+ for use in >> Guile 1.9 (aka. the development branch)? > > I don't know who gets to make these

Re: `count-one-bits' -> LGPLv2+

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Would you be OK to relicense `count-one-bits' under LGPLv2+ for use in > Guile 1.9 (aka. the development branch)? I don't know who gets to make these decisions, but as the module's maintainer I'm fine with that. -- Ben Pfaff http://benpfaff.org