Re: `#error' vs string literal

2006-03-07 Thread Paul Eggert
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf/2005-09/msg6.html Yes, that sounds familiar. The distinction here is that one should probably not rely on #error within .m4 tests, since the results of the tests might not be reliable. But within ordina

Re: `#error' vs string literal

2006-03-07 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Jim, * Jim Meyering wrote on Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 05:20:52PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > | * md5.c: Use `#error' rather than a string literal to provoke > > failure. > > | * sha1.c: Likewise. > > > > I could not find corresponding discussion or bug

Re: `#error' vs string literal

2006-03-07 Thread Jim Meyering
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another thing struck me: > > * Paul Eggert wrote on Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 01:48:54AM CET: >> (AC_HEADER_STDBOOL): Don't assume "#error" works. Glad you spotted that. ... > This technique is not followed consistently in gnulib (unlike Autoconf). > I