Re: [PATCH 3/5] 64-bit obstack support, part 1

2014-10-31 Thread Alan Modra
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:52:29PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > It would be easier to review if you separated the very trivial changes from > the others. The size_t change is clearly fine and can be approved quickly. > The refactoring requires more attention. Split as requested and attached. -

Re: [PATCH 3/5] 64-bit obstack support, part 1

2014-10-31 Thread Roland McGrath
It would be easier to review if you separated the very trivial changes from the others. The size_t change is clearly fine and can be approved quickly. The refactoring requires more attention.