Hi,
Reuben Thomas wrote:
> strrstr, which is to strstr as strrchr is to strchr, is a useful and
> moderately widely-used function.
Is it useful? Like strstr, is works on strings of bytes, not characters.
I.e. if it is applied to strings of characters, the result is wrong in
multibyte locales who
Hi,
strrstr, which is to strstr as strrchr is to strchr, is a useful and
moderately widely-used function. It's included in source form in quite a few
programs. I have written an implementation that is part of a GNU program
(GNU Zile). I'd be happy to see it in gnulib. Any chance of that? What
