On 11/11/10 18:58, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Bruce Korb wrote:
>> First patch changes the failing printf tests so that:
>> 1. ...
>> 2. the wrapper scripts detect "I failed on the first
>>iteration" exit codes and causes the test to be
>>bypassed with "exit 77" exit codes.
>
> But that means t
Bruce Korb wrote:
> First patch changes the failing printf tests so that:
> 1. ...
> 2. the wrapper scripts detect "I failed on the first
>iteration" exit codes and causes the test to be
>bypassed with "exit 77" exit codes.
But that means that the test would be skipped in some circumstance
Hi Bruce,
On 12 Nov 2010, at 08:07, Bruce Korb wrote:
> First patch changes the failing printf tests so that:
> 1. the executables are only fired up once
> 2. the wrapper scripts detect "I failed on the first
> iteration" exit codes and causes the test to be
> bypassed with "exit 77" exit code
First patch changes the failing printf tests so that:
1. the executables are only fired up once
2. the wrapper scripts detect "I failed on the first
iteration" exit codes and causes the test to be
bypassed with "exit 77" exit codes.
>From f015bed9d6ad2fde5f0f86e941e8094e3eb14d37 Mon Sep 17 00
