On 26 September 2010 12:37, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Reuben Thomas writes:
>
>> On 21 September 2010 21:51, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>>> Thanks, applied. I didn't see a patch for ChangeLog in there though? I
>>> added it myself and pushed it separately.
>>
>> I used git format-patch, which seeme
Reuben Thomas writes:
> On 21 September 2010 21:51, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> Thanks, applied. I didn't see a patch for ChangeLog in there though? I
>> added it myself and pushed it separately.
>
> I used git format-patch, which seemed to put my ChangeLog entry at the
> top. I see that that is
On 21 September 2010 21:51, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Thanks, applied. I didn't see a patch for ChangeLog in there though? I
> added it myself and pushed it separately.
I used git format-patch, which seemed to put my ChangeLog entry at the
top. I see that that is not specifically a patch to Chan
Reuben Thomas writes:
> On 21 September 2010 14:59, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> The intent was to document how the xalloc-die module is used by many
>> other modules in gnulib to handle out of memory conditions. Maybe you
>> are right and it is no longer useful to have in the manual, as it could
On 21 September 2010 14:59, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> The intent was to document how the xalloc-die module is used by many
> other modules in gnulib to handle out of memory conditions. Maybe you
> are right and it is no longer useful to have in the manual, as it could
> be documented in the xalloc
Reuben Thomas writes:
> On 21 September 2010 13:34, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> Reuben Thomas writes:
>>
>>> Are the mentions of GSS in the section "Out of memory handling" bogus
>>> cut-and-paste-o's or similar? A bit of googling suggests that the text
>>> has indeed been cut and pasted from the
On 21 September 2010 13:34, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Reuben Thomas writes:
>
>> Are the mentions of GSS in the section "Out of memory handling" bogus
>> cut-and-paste-o's or similar? A bit of googling suggests that the text
>> has indeed been cut and pasted from the GNU GSS manual. It seems that
Reuben Thomas writes:
> Are the mentions of GSS in the section "Out of memory handling" bogus
> cut-and-paste-o's or similar? A bit of googling suggests that the text
> has indeed been cut and pasted from the GNU GSS manual. It seems that
> this section is essentially meant to document xalloc_die
Are the mentions of GSS in the section "Out of memory handling" bogus
cut-and-paste-o's or similar? A bit of googling suggests that the text
has indeed been cut and pasted from the GNU GSS manual. It seems that
this section is essentially meant to document xalloc_die (not
xalloc_fail_func, which is
