Re: License pedantry

2009-09-25 Thread Bruno Haible
Ian Beckwith wrote: > once a package reaches the stable distribution, it > can only be updated to fix security problems. > > This means that although users of the unstable and testing > distributions will have a pretty up to date gnulib, users of the > stable distribution will have a version that

Re: License pedantry

2009-09-24 Thread Ian Beckwith
Hi, Sorry about the delay replying. On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 07:03:29AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > Our argument has been that gnulib is for developers, and probably should > not be distributed as a package. Read gnulib-intro.texi for why we think > that snapshots of gnulib are counter-productive.

Re: License pedantry

2009-09-24 Thread Ian Beckwith
Hi, Sorry about the delay replying. On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:08:01PM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote: > Welcome! It was a bit unfortunate that gnulib was "frozen" in Debian for > about a year, although gnulib attempts to be constantly moving and > improving. See > http://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib

Re: License pedantry

2009-09-19 Thread Bruno Haible
David Lutterkort wrote: > > Would you also accept to change the license mentioned in the header > > to say "GPL", like we do for the rest of gnulib? (The files stay under > > LGPLv2+, since we don't change modules/safe-alloc?) > > Yes, that's fine by me - as long as the license for the module stay

Re: License pedantry

2009-09-18 Thread David Lutterkort
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 22:08 +0200, Bruno Haible wrote: > Ian Beckwith wrote: > > * Replaces incorrect FSF addresses with pointers to www.gnu.org/licenses. > > (picked up by 'licensecheck', in the debian devscripts package). > > David, is the following change OK with you? > > Would you also acce

Re: License pedantry

2009-09-17 Thread Bruno Haible
Ian Beckwith wrote: > * Replaces incorrect FSF addresses with pointers to www.gnu.org/licenses. > (picked up by 'licensecheck', in the debian devscripts package). David, is the following change OK with you? Would you also accept to change the license mentioned in the header to say "GPL", like w

Re: License pedantry

2009-09-17 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Ian, Ian Beckwith wrote: > I've recently adopted the Debian gnulib package. Welcome! It was a bit unfortunate that gnulib was "frozen" in Debian for about a year, although gnulib attempts to be constantly moving and improving. See http://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/html_node/Steady-De

Re: License pedantry

2009-09-17 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Ian Beckwith on 9/17/2009 6:51 AM: > Hi, > > I've recently adopted the Debian gnulib package. Our argument has been that gnulib is for developers, and probably should not be distributed as a package. Read gnulib-intro.texi for why we th

License pedantry

2009-09-17 Thread Ian Beckwith
Hi, I've recently adopted the Debian gnulib package. Documenting the copyright and licenses of all the files (a tedious but (currently) necessary process), I spotted a few extremely minor issues, and ran into a few things I'd like clarifying. The attached patch: * Replaces incorrect FSF address