Re: Inaccurate description of configure option --without-included-regex

2009-03-18 Thread Jim Meyering
Eric Blake wrote: > According to Reuben Thomas on 3/17/2009 5:53 PM: >> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Jim Meyering wrote: >> >>> Thanks. That sounds like a fine improvement. >>> Do you feel like writing a commit-log/ChangeLog entry, too? >>> (i.e., git format-patch output, per e.g., >>> http://git.sv.gnu.

Re: Inaccurate description of configure option --without-included-regex

2009-03-17 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Reuben Thomas on 3/17/2009 6:36 PM: > On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Eric Blake wrote: > >> In the meantime, I did a search of the copyright assignments; I see that >> you have assignment on file for coreutuils, but not gnulib. Since it >> is a >>

Re: Inaccurate description of configure option --without-included-regex

2009-03-17 Thread Reuben Thomas
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Eric Blake wrote: In the meantime, I did a search of the copyright assignments; I see that you have assignment on file for coreutuils, but not gnulib. Since it is a separate project, I'd recommend repeating the process to ensure your future gnulib contributions are not a pr

Re: Inaccurate description of configure option --without-included-regex

2009-03-17 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Reuben Thomas on 3/17/2009 5:53 PM: > On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Jim Meyering wrote: > >> Thanks. That sounds like a fine improvement. >> Do you feel like writing a commit-log/ChangeLog entry, too? >> (i.e., git format-patch output, per e.g.,

Re: Inaccurate description of configure option --without-included-regex

2009-03-17 Thread Reuben Thomas
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Jim Meyering wrote: Thanks. That sounds like a fine improvement. Do you feel like writing a commit-log/ChangeLog entry, too? (i.e., git format-patch output, per e.g., http://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/coreutils.git/plain/HACKING) Attached; since I haven't done this before, let

Re: Inaccurate description of configure option --without-included-regex

2009-03-17 Thread Jim Meyering
Reuben Thomas wrote: > The documentation says: > > --without-included-regex > don't compile regex; this is the default on 32-bit > systems with recent-enough versions of the GNU C > Library (use with caution on other sy

Inaccurate description of configure option --without-included-regex

2009-03-17 Thread Reuben Thomas
The documentation says: --without-included-regex don't compile regex; this is the default on 32-bit systems with recent-enough versions of the GNU C Library (use with caution on other systems). On