Sam Steingold wrote:
> > +extern
> > +# ifdef __cplusplus
> > +"C"
> > +# endif
> > +DIR *fdopendir (int);
>
> that's pretty awful.
> maybe there is a way to use the m4 magic to avoid replacing 1 line with 5?
Maybe. But the number of lines of a test program is not important to me;
it is much more
> * Bruno Haible [2011-07-22 00:18:04 +0200]:
>
> -extern DIR *fdopendir (int);
> +extern
> +# ifdef __cplusplus
> +"C"
> +# endif
> +DIR *fdopendir (int);
that's pretty awful.
maybe there is a way to use the m4 magic to avoid replacing 1 line with 5?
--
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) o
Sam Steingold wrote:
> > The problem that clisp/src/m4/ioctl.m4 tests against is fixed in Solaris 7
> > and newer, but is present in Solaris 2.6, FreeBSD 6.4, IRIX 6.5.
>
> are they still "porting targets"?
> could you please move this to gnulib from clisp?
FreeBSD 6.4 is not so different from th
> * Bruno Haible [2011-07-21 02:19:07 +0200]:
>
>> I pulled ioctl module from gnulib because of a compilation error about
>> "ioctl_used_without_requesting_gnulib_ioctl" and I am wondering whether
>> the HAVE_RELIABLE_FIONREAD et al are still relevant.
>
> The problem that clisp/src/m4/ioctl.m4 te
Hi Sam,
> I pulled ioctl module from gnulib because of a compilation error about
> "ioctl_used_without_requesting_gnulib_ioctl" and I am wondering whether
> the HAVE_RELIABLE_FIONREAD et al are still relevant.
The problem that clisp/src/m4/ioctl.m4 tests against is fixed in Solaris 7
and newer, b
Hi Bruno,
I pulled ioctl module from gnulib because of a compilation error about
"ioctl_used_without_requesting_gnulib_ioctl" and I am wondering whether
the HAVE_RELIABLE_FIONREAD et al are still relevant.
Also, I get this error on linux:
/home/sds/src/clisp/sf/clisp/build-g-gxx/gllib/sys/ioctl.h:
