On 3-Jul-2011, Bruno Haible wrote:
| subdirectory modules/fortran/ -, and that you follow the GNU conventions for
| Fortran code (whatever these may be - you can find out by looking at octave
| in octave-3.4.2/libcruft/ [3]).
I wouldn't recommend trying to follow the style of the Fortran code in
On 20-Jul-2011, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
| I agree libcraft is really ugly.
|
| Could you review the binding ?
I don't use Fortran much these days. I don't write anything new using
it, so I'm probably not the right person to review it.
| Do you have use in octave?
Not really. The Fortran cod
I agree libcraft is really ugly.
Could you review the binding ? Do you have use in octave?
Bastien
Le 20 juil. 2011 18:44, "John W. Eaton" a écrit :
On 3-Jul-2011, Bruno Haible wrote:
| subdirectory modules/fortran/ -, and that you follow the GNU ...
I wouldn't recommend trying to follow the
Le dimanche 3 juillet 2011 22:20:07, Bruno Haible a écrit :
> Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > Fist piece of work will be to creat a gnulib module per posix header. I
> > will begin by errno.
> >
> > How could I get a list of pair name/value of every errno supported on the
> > plateform ?
>
> This wa
Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> Fist piece of work will be to creat a gnulib module per posix header. I will
> begin by errno.
>
> How could I get a list of pair name/value of every errno supported on the
> plateform ?
This was discussed in the thread starting at [1].
But if it is so complicated, w
Le dimanche 3 juillet 2011 19:32:42, Bruno Haible a écrit :
> Hi Bastien,
>
> > ... binding posix to fortran.
>
> Yes apparently it requires explicit binding code, cf. [1][2]
>
> > Would you consider this for inclusion ?
>
> Yes, why not? Fortran is sufficiently well supported by GCC and by
> A
Hi Bastien,
> ... binding posix to fortran.
Yes apparently it requires explicit binding code, cf. [1][2]
> Would you consider this for inclusion ?
Yes, why not? Fortran is sufficiently well supported by GCC and by Automake.
Just make sure that your modules follow the gnulib conventions for the
Hi,
Do you think it is worthwhile to contribute module (in fortran95
sense) for binding posix to fortran.
I believe it is directly good to use gnulib instead then system posix
libc in order to improve portability.
Would you consider this for inclusion ?
bastien
