On 03/14/2011 08:23 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> However, I find that adding a whole new .x-sc_* file
> just to exempt an exceptional source file from one of the
> many syntax checks is a disproportionate burden.
> It has always bothered me to do that.
>
> So finally, here's a proposed maint.mk patch
Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On 14 March 2011 14:23, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> - exit (1);
>> - exit (0);
>> + return 1;
>> + return 1;
>
> Was that intentional? i.e. should second return be return 0?
Not at all. Thank you!
I've fixed it locally.
On 14 March 2011 14:23, Jim Meyering wrote:
> - exit (1);
> - exit (0);
> + return 1;
> + return 1;
Was that intentional? i.e. should second return be return 0?
--
http://rrt.sc3d.org
Reuben Thomas wrote:
> make syntax-check is complaining about space-tabs (sc_space_tab) in a
> sort of file where this is perfectly permissable: a .diff file. Why do
> I have a diff file in version control? Because I'm patching gnulib.
>
> Of course, I can add this to VC_LIST_ALWAYS_EXCLUDE_REGEX,
make syntax-check is complaining about space-tabs (sc_space_tab) in a
sort of file where this is perfectly permissable: a .diff file. Why do
I have a diff file in version control? Because I'm patching gnulib.
Of course, I can add this to VC_LIST_ALWAYS_EXCLUDE_REGEX, but maybe
.diff files should b
