Jim Meyering wrote:
> I have written wrappers for getfilecon, lgetfilecon,
> and fgetfilecon each of which uses ENODATA to distinguish
> a particular failure mode from ENOTSUP:
> ...
> if it's easy to add support for ENODATA in the errno module,
> I'd prefer that, since the API for the getfilecon f
Eric Blake wrote:
> OK to commit these cleanups? Maybe we should push on Bruno to add ENODATA to
> gnulib's replacement, particularly since you are now considering
> using ENODATA for SELinux errors. While the system.h version allows
> compilation, it would be better to have a dedicated errno ra
