According to Simon Josefsson on 2/18/2010 6:00 AM:
>> I've seen these failures for a long time now, but have not been bothered
>> enough by them to do anything about it (m4 is single-threaded, so I use
>> gnulib-tool --avoid tls-tests to avoid the test in the first place).
>>
> I don't think there
Eric Blake writes:
> According to Simon Josefsson on 2/18/2010 12:52 AM:
>> Bruno Haible writes:
>>
Starting test_cond .../bin/sh: line 5: 3124 Aborted (core
dumped)
FAIL: test-cond.exe
Starting test_lock .../bin/sh: line 5: 1336 Aborted
According to Simon Josefsson on 2/18/2010 12:52 AM:
> Bruno Haible writes:
>
>>> Starting test_cond .../bin/sh: line 5: 3124 Aborted (core
>>> dumped)
>>> FAIL: test-cond.exe
>>>
>>> Starting test_lock .../bin/sh: line 5: 1336 Aborted (core
>>> dumped)
>>> FAIL
Ralf Wildenhues writes:
> * Simon Josefsson wrote on Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 08:58:14AM CET:
>> > The build times are interesting:
>> >
>> > gnulib-tool: 324 minutes
>> > ./configure: 36 minutes
>> > make check: 34 minutes
>
>> The build times are now:
>>
>> gnulib-tool: 418 minutes
>> ./configure:
* Simon Josefsson wrote on Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 08:58:14AM CET:
> > The build times are interesting:
> >
> > gnulib-tool: 324 minutes
> > ./configure: 36 minutes
> > make check: 34 minutes
> The build times are now:
>
> gnulib-tool: 418 minutes
> ./configure: 43 minutes
> make check: 38 minutes
>
Simon Josefsson writes:
> The build times are interesting:
>
> gnulib-tool: 324 minutes
> ./configure: 36 minutes
> make check: 34 minutes
Another build, on the same physical hardware, is available from:
http://autobuild.josefsson.org/gnulib/log-201002171652277193000.txt
The build times are no
Bruno Haible writes:
>> Starting test_cond .../bin/sh: line 5: 3124 Aborted (core
>> dumped)
>> FAIL: test-cond.exe
>>
>> Starting test_lock .../bin/sh: line 5: 1336 Aborted (core
>> dumped)
>> FAIL: test-lock.exe
>>
>> Starting test_tls .../bin/sh: line 5:
* Simon Josefsson wrote on Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 08:07:41AM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues writes:
> > I would volunteer to dig out and forward-port my gnulib-tool
> > optimization patches that cut its execution time in half,
> > if there is a nonzero chance of them being accepted. Last time,
> > Bruno rej
Ralf Wildenhues writes:
> Hello,
>
> * Simon Josefsson wrote on Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:49:19AM CET:
>> The build times are interesting:
>>
>> gnulib-tool: 324 minutes
>> ./configure: 36 minutes
>> make check: 34 minutes
>>
>> Now, gnulib-tool invokes run ./configure too, but that seems like ju
Hello,
* Simon Josefsson wrote on Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:49:19AM CET:
> The build times are interesting:
>
> gnulib-tool: 324 minutes
> ./configure: 36 minutes
> make check: 34 minutes
>
> Now, gnulib-tool invokes run ./configure too, but that seems like just a
> small fraction of the time it s
Simon Josefsson writes:
> I'll try to set the machine up to build it once per day or so, depending
> on how long it takes.
Another report is available at:
http://autobuild.josefsson.org/gnulib/log-201001130336758941000.txt
It has the same failures as before since it didn't use the absolutely
l
Bruno Haible writes:
> Hi Simon,
>
>> The tests that failed were:
>>
>> file_has_acl("tmpdir0") returned yes, expected no
>> FAIL: test-file-has-acl.sh
>
> This is normal and expected. In Cygwin 1.5.x, setacl and chown don't
> harmonize: if a program calls setacl after chown, the permissions are
Hi Simon,
> The tests that failed were:
>
> file_has_acl("tmpdir0") returned yes, expected no
> FAIL: test-file-has-acl.sh
This is normal and expected. In Cygwin 1.5.x, setacl and chown don't
harmonize: if a program calls setacl after chown, the permissions are
wrong, and if the program calls ch
FYI, a build of gnulib on cygwin on Windows XP just finished, a build
report here:
http://autobuild.josefsson.org/gnulib/log-201001121401712536000.txt
I'll try to set the machine up to build it once per day or so, depending
on how long it takes.
The tests that failed were:
file_has_acl("tmpdir0
14 matches
Mail list logo
