Re: C99 strto* protos

2006-04-21 Thread Derek R. Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Derek R. Price wrote: > x86 NetBSD 2.0.2 > alpha Linux 2.2.20 #2 > ppc64 Linux 2.6.5-7.97-pseries64 #1 SMP > x86 Linux 2.6.10-1.771_FC2smp > x86 Linux 2.6.8-2-386 > x86 Linux 2.6.13-1.1526_FC4 > sparc SunOS 5.9 Generic_112233-03 I can confirm that th

Re: C99 strto* protos

2006-04-19 Thread Derek R. Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Derek R. Price wrote: > Paul Eggert wrote: >>> "Derek R. Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> Is there any reason that a few files (getndelim2.c, fsusage.c, mkdtemp.c, obstack.c, tempname.c, utimecmp.c) still do #ifdef HAVE_STDINT_H, #

Re: C99 strto* protos

2006-04-19 Thread Derek R. Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Eggert wrote: > "Derek R. Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Is there any reason that a few files (getndelim2.c, fsusage.c, >> mkdtemp.c, obstack.c, tempname.c, utimecmp.c) still do #ifdef >> HAVE_STDINT_H, #include , #endif rather than assu

Re: C99 strto* protos

2006-04-19 Thread Paul Eggert
"Derek R. Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there any reason that a few files (getndelim2.c, fsusage.c, > mkdtemp.c, obstack.c, tempname.c, utimecmp.c) still do #ifdef > HAVE_STDINT_H, #include , #endif rather than assuming the > GNULIB stdint module? Mostly because I haven't had time to ca

Re: C99 strto* protos

2006-04-19 Thread Derek R. Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Eggert wrote: > "Derek R. Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> No one has objected in about a week and this patch plus a small typo fix >> in m4/full-header-path.m4 is passing CVS nightly testing on some dozen >> platforms, so I committed it t

Re: C99 strto* protos

2006-04-19 Thread Derek R. Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Eric Blake wrote: > Grammar, fix by s/only to/just/. Done, mostly - I changed s/only to/only/ and installed it. > +++ m4/_inttypes_h.m4 11 Apr 2006 14:27:29 - > @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ > +# _inttypes_h.m4 serial 1 > > Why does this file need a leading

Re: C99 strto* protos

2006-04-19 Thread Paul Eggert
"Derek R. Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No one has objected in about a week and this patch plus a small typo fix > in m4/full-header-path.m4 is passing CVS nightly testing on some dozen > platforms, so I committed it to GNULIB. Thanks for doing all that.

Re: C99 strto* protos

2006-04-18 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Derek R. Price on 4/11/2006 8:48 AM: > No one has objected in about a week and this patch plus a small typo fix > in m4/full-header-path.m4 is passing CVS nightly testing on some dozen > platforms, so I committed it to GNULIB. Sorry I ha

Re: C99 strto* protos

2006-04-18 Thread Derek R. Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Derek R. Price wrote: > 2006-04-11 Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * lib/inttypes.h: New file. > * lib/strtoimax.c: Assume . > * m4/_inttypes_h.m4, m4/full-header-path.m4, m

Re: C99 strto* protos

2006-04-11 Thread Derek R. Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Eggert wrote: > How about if gnulib creates an that has the declarations > that the standard requires? The gnulib can look like this: So, you were suggesting something like the attached mess? The new file looks mostly like what you were sugg

Re: C99 strto* protos

2006-04-10 Thread Paul Eggert
"Derek R. Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > GNULIB doesn't seem to be providing function prototypes for several > strto* replacement functions. Is this intentional? Haven't got around to it, I think. > Would a patch to provide a "strtoimax.h" and "strtoumax.h" with the > strtoimax and strtou

C99 strto* protos

2006-04-10 Thread Derek R. Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, GNULIB doesn't seem to be providing function prototypes for several strto* replacement functions. Is this intentional? The protos for strtoll() and strtoull() are required by C99 (not C89) and I imagine might therefore be missing from the C8