Re: .cvsignore and .gitignore

2008-11-20 Thread Reuben Thomas
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008, Bruno Haible wrote: Hi, Reuben Thomas wrote: There seem to be basically two classes of user when it comes to what is ignored: 1. gnulib is considered as a build dependency, so no files provided or generated by gnulib are put in CVS/git. 2. gnulib is not considered as a bu

Re: .cvsignore and .gitignore

2008-11-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Bruno, Reuben, * Bruno Haible wrote on Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 02:14:40AM CET: [...] > The doc says that if you're a case 2, you can pass the option --no-vc-files > to gnulib-tool. This will solve half of your problem. > > The other half is that you have files generated from "make" while you p

Re: .cvsignore and .gitignore

2008-11-05 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi, Reuben Thomas wrote: > There seem to be basically two classes of user when it comes to what is > ignored: > > 1. gnulib is considered as a build dependency, so no files provided or > generated by gnulib are put in CVS/git. > > 2. gnulib is not considered as a build dependency, so files pro

.cvsignore and .gitignore

2008-11-05 Thread Reuben Thomas
I've just noticed for the first time that these files (or at least .gitignore, assuming that .cvsignore works the same way) have rather odd contents. There seem to be basically two classes of user when it comes to what is ignored: 1. gnulib is considered as a build dependency, so no files pr