Re: Errors compiling fwriting.c on OSF/1

2013-06-03 Thread Paul Eggert
On 06/03/2013 06:44 PM, Albert Chin wrote: > What's the best way to fix this? Can you find out why _OSF_SOURCE isn't defined for you? http://h30097.www3.hp.com/docs/base_doc/DOCUMENTATION/V51_HTML/MAN/MAN5/0001.HTM says that _OSF_SOURCE should be on by default. If we can figure out why it's

Errors compiling fwriting.c on OSF/1

2013-06-03 Thread Albert Chin
With latest gnulib: $ uname -a OSF1 gen V5.1 732 alpha $ ./gnulib-tool --test --with-tests fwriting ... source='../../gllib/freading.c' object='freading.o' libtool=no DEPDIR=.deps depmode=tru64 /bin/ksh ../../build-aux/depcomp cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../gllib -I.. -DGNULIB_STRICT_

Re: ptsname_r on OSF/1

2012-06-24 Thread Bruno Haible
> 2012-06-24 Bruno Haible > > ptsname_r: Make it consistent with ptsname on OSF/1. > * lib/ptsname_r.c (__ptsname_r): Add a different implementation for > OSF/1. Nearly the same code works also on AIX. Unfortunately, it does not fix the problem that clo

ptsname_r on OSF/1

2012-06-24 Thread Bruno Haible
On OSF/1, gnulib's ptsname_r function returns a file name like "/dev/ttyp5". But ptsname() returns something like "/dev/pts/5". How does it do this? 'truss' reveals it: ioctl(3, 0x20007447, 0x)= 7340037 = 0x75 stat("/dev/pts/

ttyname_r on OSF/1

2012-06-24 Thread Bruno Haible
On OSF/1, I'm seeing this test failure in an *interactive* "make check" of a ptsname_r testdir: test-ptsname_r.c:193: assertion failed FAIL: test-ptsname_r It turns out the cause is a bug in gnulib's ttyname_r: It fails to add a trailing NUL byte to the output string. T

Re: grep-2.10 on OSF/1

2011-11-21 Thread Eric Blake
[adding bug-gnulib] How about having compare "know" about /dev/null. Then it can perform the test -s and warn if the file is nonempty. With that, all existing (and there are many) /dev/null-using compare uses will benefit. >> >> Nice idea. > Yes. In fact, c-set was against gn

Re: ptsname_r on OSF/1

2011-11-10 Thread Bruno Haible
on failed FAIL: test-ptsname_r Cause: ptsname_r fails with errno = ENOENT. 2011-11-10 Bruno Haible ptsname_r: Avoid compilation error on OSF/1 5.1. * lib/stdlib.in.h (ptsname_r): Override if REPLACE_PTSNAME_R is 1. * m4/stdlib_h.m4 (gl_STDLIB_H_DEFAULTS): Initialize REPLACE_PTSNAME_

Re: coreutils-8.12.193-d8dc8 on OSF/1

2011-09-07 Thread Bruno Haible
grep pthread_join __pthread_join | 0004395905075472 | T | 0008 This fixes it: Ensure that S["LIB_PTHREAD"]="-lpthread" on this platform. 2011-09-07 Bruno Haible pthread: Determine $(LIB_PTHREAD) correctly on OSF/1 5.1. * m4/pthread.m4 (gl_PTHREAD_CHECK): Use

Re: coreutils-8.12.193-d8dc8 on OSF/1

2011-09-07 Thread Bruno Haible
Paul Eggert wrote: > On 09/07/11 02:49, Bruno Haible wrote: > > -#include > > +/* Write "fcntl.h" here, not , otherwise OSF/1 5.1 DTK cc > > miscompiles > > + openat.c because that file has a preliminary #include . */ > > +#include "fcntl.h" > > Thanks. Is a similar change needed to lib/open

Re: coreutils-8.12.193-d8dc8 on OSF/1

2011-09-07 Thread Paul Eggert
On 09/07/11 02:49, Bruno Haible wrote: > -#include > +/* Write "fcntl.h" here, not , otherwise OSF/1 5.1 DTK cc > miscompiles > + openat.c because that file has a preliminary #include . */ > +#include "fcntl.h" Thanks. Is a similar change needed to lib/open.c, which plays the same trick with

Re: coreutils-8.12.193-d8dc8 on OSF/1

2011-09-07 Thread Jim Meyering
Bruno Haible wrote: > Hi Jim, Paul, > >> I hope to be able to make the coreutils-8.13 release on Wednesday. > > There is a regression: A new compilation error on OSF/1 5.1. > > CC openat.o > cc: Error: openat.h, line 59: In this statement, "AT_SYML

coreutils-8.12.193-d8dc8 on OSF/1

2011-09-07 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Jim, Paul, > I hope to be able to make the coreutils-8.13 release on Wednesday. There is a regression: A new compilation error on OSF/1 5.1. CC openat.o cc: Error: openat.h, line 59: In this statement, "AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW" is not declared. (undeclared) return fchow

Re: coreutils-8.12.178-df9cd on OSF/1 5.1

2011-09-01 Thread Bruno Haible
> > On OSF/1 5.1: > > Build error. The next build error is: $ gmake V=1 ... cc -O -o df df.o find-mount-point.o libver.a ../lib/libcoreutils.a ../lib/libcoreutils.a /home/haible/prefix-osf51-cc/lib/libiconv.so -rpath /home/haible/prefix-osf51-cc/lib ld: Unresolved: strto

Re: spawn-pipe tests on OSF/1

2011-06-17 Thread Bruno Haible
Tom G. Christensen wrote: > With this change there is still a link failure on CentOS 5.6: > gcc -std=gnu99 -g -O2 -Wall -o test-spawn-pipe-child > test-spawn-pipe-child.o -lm -lm -lm -lm -lm -lm -lm -lm -lm -lm -lm > test-spawn-pipe-child.o: In function `main': > /home/tgc/projects/gnulib/buil

Re: spawn-pipe tests on OSF/1

2011-06-17 Thread Tom G. Christensen
On 06/17/2011 01:45 PM, Bruno Haible wrote: On 2011-06-06 I wrote: spawn-pipe tests: Like the child program only against libc. 2011-06-17 Bruno Haible spawn-pipe tests: Fix link error. * tests/test-spawn-pipe-child.c: Undefine fflush. With this change there is still

Re: spawn-pipe tests on OSF/1

2011-06-17 Thread Bruno Haible
On 2011-06-06 I wrote: > spawn-pipe tests: Like the child program only against libc. One link failure is still present: gcc -g -O2 -o test-spawn-pipe-child test-spawn-pipe-child.o test-spawn-pipe-child.o: In function `main': /tmp/testdir/gltests/test-spawn-pipe-child.c:86: undefined re

Re: spawn-pipe tests on OSF/1

2011-06-06 Thread Bruno Haible
I wrote: > This failure is probably due to the many libraries against which the child > program is linked: > > $ ldd gettext-0.18.2/gettext-tools/gnulib-tests/.libs/*test-spawn-pipe* > > Main => > gettext-0.18.2/gettext-tools/gnulib-tests/.libs/lt-test-spawn-pipe > libiconv.so

Re: spawn-pipe tests on OSF/1

2011-06-06 Thread Stefano Lattarini
I Bruno. Hope you doon't mind if I chime in just to signal ... On Monday 06 June 2011, Bruno Haible wrote: > > 2011-06-06 Bruno Haible > > spawn-pipe tests: Like the child program only against libc. > ... this probable typo (should s/Like/Link/ I think). Regards, Stefano

spawn-pipe tests on OSF/1

2011-06-06 Thread Bruno Haible
On OSF/1 5.1 with cc (but not with gcc), and only in the gettext build, not in testdirs, I see a test failure like this: test-spawn-pipe.c:80: assertion failed (null): /home/haible/gettext-0.18.2/gettext-tools/gnulib-tests/.libs/lt-test-spawn-pipe subprocess got fatal signal 6 test-spawn

Re: rename, renameat test failures on OSF/1

2010-12-24 Thread Jim Meyering
Bruno Haible wrote: > Hi Eric, > >> > -ASSERT (errno == EINVAL || errno == EBUSY); >> > +ASSERT (errno == EINVAL || errno == EBUSY || errno == EEXIST); > >> The patch to relax the testsuite looks okay to me; we're already >> allowing other non-standard errno values here, so no one h

Re: rename, renameat test failures on OSF/1

2010-12-24 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Eric, > > -ASSERT (errno == EINVAL || errno == EBUSY); > > +ASSERT (errno == EINVAL || errno == EBUSY || errno == EEXIST); > The patch to relax the testsuite looks okay to me; we're already > allowing other non-standard errno values here, so no one has complained > about it cau

getlogin_r on OSF/1 5.1

2010-12-22 Thread Bruno Haible
On OSF/1 5.1 I'm seeing this test failure: test-getlogin_r.c:76: assertion failed sh: 363055 Abort - core dumped FAIL: test-getlogin_r The reason is that the OSF/1 getlogin_r() function produces a truncated result when the buffer is not large enough. As if with strncpy. This is not exactly

ptsname on OSF/1 5.1

2010-12-22 Thread Bruno Haible
On OSF/1 5.1, the ptsname test fails: test-ptsname.c:78: assertion failed sh: 366922 Abort - core dumped FAIL: test-ptsname The reason is that for e.g. a master of "/dev/ptype" the ptsname function returns the slave "/dev/pts/14" but our code expects "/dev/ttype".

ttyname_r on OSF/1

2010-12-22 Thread Bruno Haible
On OSF/1 5.1, the ttyname_r test fails: test-ttyname_r.c:45: assertion failed sh: 367584 Abort - core dumped FAIL: test-ttyname_r The reason is that ttyname_r stores its result in the buffer, ignoring the buffer's size. This patch provides a workaround: 2010-12-22 Bruno H

rename, renameat test failures on OSF/1

2010-12-22 Thread Bruno Haible
On OSF/1 5.1, I get these test failures: test-rename.h:342: assertion failed sh: 366977 Abort - core dumped FAIL: test-rename test-rename.h:342: assertion failed sh: 366978 Abort - core dumped FAIL: test-renameat The reason are different errno values. The following patch fixes it for me. OK to

Re: rename, renameat test failures on OSF/1

2010-12-22 Thread Eric Blake
On 12/22/2010 08:31 AM, Bruno Haible wrote: > On OSF/1 5.1, I get these test failures: > > test-rename.h:342: assertion failed > sh: 366977 Abort - core dumped > FAIL: test-rename > > test-rename.h:342: assertion failed > sh: 366978 Abort - core dumped > FAIL: test-r

Re: popen on OSF/1 5.1

2010-12-21 Thread Jim Meyering
Bruno Haible wrote: > On OSF/1 5.1 I got these test build failures: > > depbase=`echo test-stdio-c++.o | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/&|;s|\.o$||'`; g++ > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -DGNULIB_STRICT_CHECKING=1 -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. > -I../gllib -I./../gllib -mieee -MT

Re: signature warnings on OSF/1 5.1

2010-12-20 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Simon, > > * test-gethostname.c:24: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer > > type > > Similarly: > > - POSIX: int gethostname(char *, size_t); > > - OSF/1: int gethostname(char *, int); > > > > Likewise. > > > > * test-inet_ntop.c:24: warning: initialization from incompatible

Re: signature warnings on OSF/1 5.1

2010-12-20 Thread Simon Josefsson
Bruno Haible writes: > * test-gethostname.c:24: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer > type > Similarly: > - POSIX: int gethostname(char *, size_t); > - OSF/1: int gethostname(char *, int); > > Likewise. > > * test-inet_ntop.c:24: warning: initialization from incompatible pointe

wcsrtombs on OSF/1

2010-12-20 Thread Bruno Haible
On OSF/1 5.1, I'm seeing this gcc warning: wcsrtombs.c: In function 'rpl_wcsrtombs': wcsrtombs.c:44: warning: passing argument 4 of 'wcsrtombs' from incompatible pointer type The reason is that wcsrtombs exists but mbstate_t and mbsinit() are replaced by gnu

iswblank on OSF/1

2010-12-19 Thread Bruno Haible
Still on OSF/1 5.1, I see this error: depbase=`echo test-wctype-c++.o | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/&|;s|\.o$||'`; g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -DGNULIB_STRICT_CHECKING=1 -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -I../gllib -I./../gllib -Wall -mieee -MT test-wctype-c++.o -MD -MP -MF $depbase.Tpo -c -o tes

SIGRTMIN on OSF/1 5.1

2010-12-19 Thread Bruno Haible
On OSF/1 5.1, I'm seeing this warning: strsignal.c: In function 'strsignal': strsignal.c:111: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 4 has type 'long int' The reason is that while POSIX says that SIGRTMIN and SIGRTMAX expand to

socket functions on OSF/1

2010-12-19 Thread Bruno Haible
On OSF/1, the functions recv(), recvfrom(), send(), sendto() are declared with an old-style declaration (return value 'int' instead of 'ssize_t', and no use of 'socklen_t') by default. The fix is easy, this time: just setting _POSIX_PII_SOCKET does

tcgetsid on OSF/1

2010-12-19 Thread Bruno Haible
On OSF/1 5.1, the function tcgetsid() exists but is not declared by default. (It would be with _XOPEN_SOURCE=500, but this is not a choice we can make.) This leads to an error: In file included from test-termios-c++.cc:22: ../gllib/termios.h:355: error: '::tcgetsid' has not bee

popen on OSF/1 5.1

2010-12-19 Thread Bruno Haible
On OSF/1 5.1 I got these test build failures: depbase=`echo test-stdio-c++.o | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/&|;s|\.o$||'`; g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -DGNULIB_STRICT_CHECKING=1 -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -I../gllib -I./../gllib -mieee -MT test-stdio-c++.o -MD -MP -MF $depbase.Tpo -c -o te

signature warnings on OSF/1 5.1

2010-12-19 Thread Bruno Haible
On OSF/1 5.1 I'm also seeing these gcc warnings: * test-getaddrinfo.c:26: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type This one is because the gai_strerror declaration is different from POSIX: - POSIX: const char *gai_strerror(int); - OSF/1: char *gai_strerror(int); I

unsetenv on OSF/1

2010-12-19 Thread Bruno Haible
On OSF/1, unsetenv() is also not declared by default. As a consequence, there is an error in the C++ tests: ../gllib/stdlib.h:1022: error: 'unsetenv' was not declared in this scope ../gllib/stdlib.h:1022: error: invalid type in declaration before ';' token and also the conf

setenv on OSF/1

2010-12-19 Thread Bruno Haible
r: invalid type in declaration before ';' token This fixes it. 2010-12-19 Bruno Haible setenv: Add missing declaration on OSF/1 5.1. * lib/stdlib.in.h (setenv): Test HAVE_DECL_SETENV, not HAVE_SETENV. * m4/setenv.m4 (gl_FUNC_SETENV_SEPARATE): Test whether s

mknod on OSF/1

2010-12-19 Thread Bruno Haible
On OSF/1 with g++, I'm seeing this error in the test suite: depbase=`echo test-glob-c++.o | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/&|;s|\.o$||'`; g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -DGNULIB_STRICT_CHECKING=1 -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -I../gllib -I./../gllib -mieee -MT test-glob-c++.o -MD -MP -MF $depb

fseeko, ftello on OSF/1

2010-12-19 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi, On OSF/1 5.1, the declarations of fseeko() and ftello() are missing by default. Setting _XOPEN_SOURCE=500 would provide these declarations but is not the right fix (see previous mail about fchdir()). I'll add this fix for fseeko and similarly for ftello: 2010-12-19 Bruno H

fchdir on OSF/1

2010-12-19 Thread Bruno Haible
fchdir: Add missing declaration on OSF/1 5.1. * lib/unistd.in.h (fchdir): Provide declaration if systems lacks it. * m4/fchdir.m4 (gl_FUNC_FCHDIR): Check whether fchdir is declared. * m4/unistd_h.m4 (gl_UNISTD_H_DEFAULTS): Initialize HAVE_DECL_FCHDIR. * modul

struct random_data on OSF/1

2009-01-25 Thread Bruno Haible
On OSF/1 5.1, the gettext build fails like this: cc: Error: ../gnulib-lib/stdlib.h, line 50: In this declaration, the struct "random_data" is redefined. (redefstruct) struct random_data ^ *** Exit 1 The reason is that this platform has 'struct random_data' declared in , n

Re: on OSF/1

2008-10-05 Thread Bruno Haible
Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > The patch is obviously correct. You can apply it, together with this > > enhancement of the unit test. I'll test it in the next few days. > > Done. I'm updating the doc: 2008-10-05 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * doc/posix-headers/sys_select.texi: Mention '

Re: on OSF/1

2008-09-29 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Bruno Haible wrote: > Hi Paolo, > >> What about this patch? Bruno, can you give it a try on OSF/1? > > The patch is obviously correct. You can apply it, together with this > enhancement of the unit test. I'll test it in the next few days. Done. Paolo

Re: on OSF/1

2008-09-29 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Paolo, > What about this patch? Bruno, can you give it a try on OSF/1? The patch is obviously correct. You can apply it, together with this enhancement of the unit test. I'll test it in the next few days. Bruno *** tests/test-sys_select.c.orig2008-09-29 12:42:28.000

Re: on OSF/1

2008-09-29 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Simon Josefsson wrote: > Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On OSF/1 4.0, exists but provides only a forward declaration >> of 'struct timeval', no definition of this type. > > Sigh. So it seems we need a sys_select header module and a separ

Re: on OSF/1

2008-09-29 Thread Simon Josefsson
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On OSF/1 4.0, exists but provides only a forward declaration > of 'struct timeval', no definition of this type. Sigh. So it seems we need a sys_select header module and a separate select function after all: someone might w

on OSF/1

2008-09-28 Thread Bruno Haible
On OSF/1 4.0, exists but provides only a forward declaration of 'struct timeval', no definition of this type. This leads to this error: cc -nodtk -O -std -std -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -I../gnulib-lib -I./../gnulib-lib -I/nfs/visu/telecom/users/haible/gnu/a

truncl on OSF/1 4.0

2008-04-13 Thread Bruno Haible
On OSF/1 4.0d (but not on OSF/1 5.1) the 'truncl' test fails: /bin/ksh: 3488 Memory fault(coredump) FAIL: test-truncl The reason is that the system truncl function exists and is declared, but is completely broken: $ cat foo.c #include int main () { truncl (0.0l);

Re: [Bug-tar] Building tar 1.19 on OSF/1 (HP Tru64) - make check fails

2007-11-06 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Gary E. Barnes on 11/6/2007 12:42 PM: [adding the gnulib list] > There is no snprintf on the system. If I modify src/system.c to call > sprintf instead of snprintf I can link tar. But then "make check" fails > when trying to compile ar

vasnprintf: fix overflow detection on OSF/1 5.1

2007-11-03 Thread Bruno Haible
On OSF/1 5.1, the printf() and fprintf() replacements no longer produced output of more than 1999 bytes. Wh... 2007-11-03 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * lib/vasnprintf.c (VASNPRINTF): Don't assume that snprintf's return value is C99 compliant.

Re: getaddrinfo: compilation error on OSF/1 5.1

2007-03-31 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Simon, This getaddrinfo.c error on OSF/1 is now the only remaining compilation error of all of gnulib on OSF/1, HP-UX, AIX, Solaris, IRIX. > > int getnameinfo( > > const struct sockaddr *sa, > > socklen_t salen, > > char *node, >

Re: getaddrinfo: compilation error on OSF/1 5.1

2007-03-12 Thread Simon Josefsson
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Simon, > > On OSF/1 5.1, with cc as compiler, the getaddrinfo module fails to compile: > > cc: Warning: getaddrinfo.c, line 334: In this declaration, parameter 2 has a > different type than specified in an earlier decl

getaddrinfo: compilation error on OSF/1 5.1

2007-03-11 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Simon, On OSF/1 5.1, with cc as compiler, the getaddrinfo module fails to compile: cc: Warning: getaddrinfo.c, line 334: In this declaration, parameter 2 has a different type than specified in an earlier declaration of this function. (mismatparam) int getnameinfo(const struct sockaddr

Re: [bug-gnulib] wcwidth on OSF/1

2006-08-11 Thread Paul Eggert
Eric Blake-1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why don't we instead add a new module, wchar, which provides a replacement > using the same techniques as we do with stdint.m4. Sounds reasonable to me.

Re: [bug-gnulib] wcwidth on OSF/1

2006-08-11 Thread Eric Blake-1
> Confirmed. Thanks, Albert! I wasn't aware that this was the same bug > that we work around in so many other places. > > I'm adding the fix below to gnulib. No need any more for -I/usr/include > or option -nodtk. Why don't we instead add a new module, wchar, which provides a replacement using

Re: [bug-gnulib] wcwidth on OSF/1

2006-08-11 Thread Bruno Haible
Albert Chin wrote: > > > cc: Error: /usr/include.dtk/wchar.h, line 87: Ill-formed parameter type > > > list. (parmtyplist) > > > __VA_LIST__ __arg); > > > ^ > > > configure:14834: $? = 1 > > The fix is to #include before . Confirmed. Thanks, Albert! I wasn't aware

Re: [bug-gnulib] wcwidth on OSF/1

2006-08-10 Thread Albert Chin
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 08:47:38PM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote: > Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > > Here is the culprit: > > > > configure:14791: checking whether wcwidth is declared > > configure:14828: cc -c -g conftest.c >&5 > > cc: Error: /usr/include.dtk/wchar.h, line 78: Ill-formed parameter type >

Re: [bug-gnulib] wcwidth on OSF/1

2006-08-08 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Bruno, * Bruno Haible wrote on Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 03:32:33PM CEST: > > + If GNU CC is not installed, it is therefore recommended to try > + > + env CC="cc" ./configure > + > + and if that doesn't work, try > + > + env CC="cc -nodtk" ./configure What does it need to persuad

Re: [bug-gnulib] wcwidth on OSF/1

2006-08-08 Thread Bruno Haible
. yes > alphaev67-dec-osf5.1$ /opt/TWWfsw/gmake38/bin/make all check >[[...]] > All checks successful Interesting! Thanks for this solution. I'm going to document it in gettext's INSTALL file. Bruno ******* *** 171,176 --- 171,186 env CC="cc -Ae" .

Re: [bug-gnulib] wcwidth on OSF/1

2006-08-07 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
All: Bruno Haible wrote: > Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >> Here is the culprit: >> >> configure:14791: checking whether wcwidth is declared >> configure:14828: cc -c -g conftest.c >&5 >> cc: Error: /usr/include.dtk/wchar.h, line 78: Ill-formed parameter type >> list. (parmtyplist) >> __

Re: [bug-gnulib] wcwidth on OSF/1

2006-08-07 Thread Bruno Haible
Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > Here is the culprit: > > configure:14791: checking whether wcwidth is declared > configure:14828: cc -c -g conftest.c >&5 > cc: Error: /usr/include.dtk/wchar.h, line 78: Ill-formed parameter type > list. (parmtyplist) > __VA_LIST__ __arg); > --

Re: [bug-gnulib] wcwidth on OSF/1

2006-08-07 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Bruno, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > alphaev67-dec-osf5.1$ ../configure --enable-changeword CC=gcc | >> fgrep wcwidth > checking for wcwidth... yes > checking whether wcwidth is declared... yes > alphaev67-dec-osf5.1$ fgrep WCWIDTH config.h > #define HAVE_DECL_WCWIDTH 1 > #define HAVE_WCWIDTH 1

Re: [bug-gnulib] wcwidth on OSF/1

2006-08-07 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Bruno, Bruno Haible wrote: > Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > >> A gnulib bug on osf (4.0d and 5.1): >> alphaev67-dec-osf5.1$ make all check >> cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../lib -I.. -g -c ../../lib/mbchar.c >> cc: Warning: ../../lib/wcwidth.h, line 70: In this declaration, >> parameter 1

Re: [bug-gnulib] wcwidth on OSF/1 (was: m4-1.4.6 soon?)

2006-08-07 Thread Bruno Haible
Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > A gnulib bug on osf (4.0d and 5.1): > alphaev67-dec-osf5.1$ make all check > cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../lib -I.. -g -c ../../lib/mbchar.c > cc: Warning: ../../lib/wcwidth.h, line 70: In this declaration, > parameter 1 has a different type than specified in a