Re: `base_name' and `dir_name' not documented

2014-09-29 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> The functions `base_name' and `dir_name' (or rather `mdir_name'), >> intended as replacements for `basename' and `dirname' that work on >> Windows also, are not documented in `gnulib.pdf'. I suggest to >> mention those two function names at least in `modules/dirname'. > > I applied the followi

Re: `base_name' and `dir_name' not documented

2014-09-28 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 04:43:07PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > The functions `base_name' and `dir_name' (or rather `mdir_name'), > intended as replacements for `basename' and `dirname' that work on > Windows also, are not documented in `gnulib.pdf'. I suggest to > mention those two function

`base_name' and `dir_name' not documented

2014-09-21 Thread Werner LEMBERG
The functions `base_name' and `dir_name' (or rather `mdir_name'), intended as replacements for `basename' and `dirname' that work on Windows also, are not documented in `gnulib.pdf'. I suggest to mention those two function names at least in `modules/dirname'. Werner