n Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES
wrote:
> I have some code if you want that work. If you could test, I wil lsend
> you. I have no time to create m4 and proper gnulib integration. It is
> up to you
Please test, I do not even have compiled it.
> Bastien
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at
I have some code if you want that work. If you could test, I wil lsend
you. I have no time to create m4 and proper gnulib integration. It is
up to you
Bastien
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 09:31:59AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 07/19/2011
On 07/19/2011 09:30 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
I'm wondering if the problem here is that libvirt is trying to use the
pipe-to-self mechanism as a fundamental event loop idiom. That is, the
reason libvirt is calling poll is in order to minimize CPU until
something interesting happens, where in
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 09:31:59AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 07/19/2011 09:30 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>I'm wondering if the problem here is that libvirt is trying to use the
> >>pipe-to-self mechanism as a fundamental event loop idiom. That is, the
> >>reason libvirt is calling poll i
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:56:15AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> [adding libvirt]
>
> On 06/04/2011 12:24 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 00:37, Matthias Bolte
> > wrote:
> >> After testing a while and reading MSDN docs the problem seems to be
> >> that MsgWaitForMultipleObjects
