[bug #57277] FAIL: test-canonicalize-lgpl with GCC 10

Update of bug #57277 (project findutils): Open/Closed:Open => Closed Release:None => 4.7.0 Fixed Release:None => 4.8.0 ___

[bug #57277] FAIL: test-canonicalize-lgpl with GCC 10

Update of bug #57277 (project findutils): Status:None => Fixed ___ Follow-up Comment #6: Thanks, Bruno. The attached picks up the gnulib patch by updating to latest. Pushed at: https

[bug #57277] FAIL: test-canonicalize-lgpl with GCC 10

Update of bug #57277 (project findutils): Assigned to:None => berny ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[bug #57277] FAIL: test-canonicalize-lgpl with GCC 10

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #57277 (project findutils): Fixed in gnulib today: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=commitdiff;h=b7d7afe10ddf599452bd80b8a840c830cd474b09 ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #57277] FAIL: test-canonicalize-lgpl with GCC 10

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #57277 (project findutils): > One can't decorate a function with nonnull attribute and then call the function with NULL. Doing that, an optimizing compiler can do aggressive optimizations. __attribute__ __nonnull__ actually means two things: 1) The compiler may emit warn

[bug #57277] FAIL: test-canonicalize-lgpl with GCC 10

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #57277 (project findutils): [comment #1 comment #1:] > First of all, the fix for this should go into gnulib --> adding their ML. > > Then, this test actually wants to verify the behavior of that > function when called with a NULL value (it should return NULL > and set e

[bug #57277] FAIL: test-canonicalize-lgpl with GCC 10

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #57277 (project findutils): Will this patch, that uses the same technique as canonicalize-lgpl.c, work? I can't test it, because I don't have a GCC 10 installed. diff --git a/tests/test-canonicalize-lgpl.c b/tests/test-canonicalize-lgpl.c index 4ce06e4..d9a9773 100644 -

[bug #57277] FAIL: test-canonicalize-lgpl with GCC 10

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #57277 (project findutils): First of all, the fix for this should go into gnulib --> adding their ML. Then, this test actually wants to verify the behavior of that function when called with a NULL value (it should return NULL and set errno to EINVAL). Therefore, the test