Martin Lambers wrote:
> > But EX_OK is semantically the same as EXIT_SUCCESS. So what about this
> > patch?
>
> I think that the value 0 for EX_OK is obvious enough, so that the extra
> dependency on the exit module does not provide any real benefits.
OK, I've added EX_OK as 0 now. Sorry for the e
On Wed, 24. Aug 2005, 18:39:02 +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Martin Lambers wrote:
> > Back in February, I suggested to add EX_OK to the sysexit module
> > (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2005-02/msg00042.html).
> > Is there a reason not to do that?
>
> It sounds OK to do that; glibc'
Martin Lambers wrote:
> Back in February, I suggested to add EX_OK to the sysexit module
> (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2005-02/msg00042.html).
> Is there a reason not to do that?
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>
>
> --- sysexit_h.orig2005-08-24 17:47:34.966600112 +0200
> +++ sysexit_h
