Paul Eggert wrote:
> "Derek R. Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> I will remove it in gettext-0.15.1. It will still be present in
>>> gettext-0.15.
>> What does this mean for GNULIB? Should I remove it?
>
> Generally, gnulib just mirrors the latest stable gettext version.
> Occasionally Br
"Derek R. Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I will remove it in gettext-0.15.1. It will still be present in
>> gettext-0.15.
>
> What does this mean for GNULIB? Should I remove it?
Generally, gnulib just mirrors the latest stable gettext version.
Occasionally Bruno will make exceptions but I
Bruno Haible wrote:
> Derek R. Price wrote:
>> I found this note in m4/isc-posix.m4:
>>
>> # This file is not needed with autoconf-2.53 and newer. Remove it in 2005.
>>
>> The Autoconf 2.60 also marks AC_ISC_POSIX as obsolescent.
>
> I will remove it in gettext-0.15.1. It will still be present in
Derek R. Price wrote:
> I found this note in m4/isc-posix.m4:
>
> # This file is not needed with autoconf-2.53 and newer. Remove it in 2005.
>
> The Autoconf 2.60 also marks AC_ISC_POSIX as obsolescent.
I will remove it in gettext-0.15.1. It will still be present in
gettext-0.15.
Bruno
