Re: [PATCH v2] mountlist: additional dummy FS names for Linux

2013-01-29 Thread Jim Meyering
Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 01/28/2013 01:14 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: >> On 12/14/2012 04:17 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: >>> If we're omitting "devfs", then should "devtmpfs" also be omitted? >> >> I don't think "devtmpfs" should be marked as dummy >> as there is storage associated with it. >> I.E. you

Re: [PATCH v2] mountlist: additional dummy FS names for Linux

2013-01-28 Thread Eric Wong
Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 01/28/2013 01:14 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > >On 12/14/2012 04:17 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: > >>If we're omitting "devfs", then should "devtmpfs" also be omitted? > > > >I don't think "devtmpfs" should be marked as dummy > >as there is storage associated with it. > >I.E. you

Re: [PATCH v2] mountlist: additional dummy FS names for Linux

2013-01-28 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 01/28/2013 01:14 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: On 12/14/2012 04:17 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: If we're omitting "devfs", then should "devtmpfs" also be omitted? I don't think "devtmpfs" should be marked as dummy as there is storage associated with it. I.E. you can write normal files to /dev and spa

Re: [PATCH v2] mountlist: additional dummy FS names for Linux

2013-01-28 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 12/14/2012 04:17 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: Eric Wong wrote: Jim Meyering wrote: Eric Wong wrote: * lib/mountlist.c (ME_DUMMY_0): additional dummy FS names for Linux systems. - "devpts" PTY slave filesystem - "fusectl" control filesystem for FUSE - "mqueue" enumerates POSIX messa

Re: [PATCH v2] mountlist: additional dummy FS names for Linux

2012-12-15 Thread Jim Meyering
Eric Wong wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> Thanks. I've tweaked the log and added a matching ChangeLog entry. >> Testing via df on my F18 laptop, diff -u <(src/df-prev) <(src/df) >> shows no difference. What do people think of this entry from >> that F18 system? >> >> devtmpfs 1538304

Re: [PATCH v2] mountlist: additional dummy FS names for Linux

2012-12-13 Thread Eric Wong
Jim Meyering wrote: > Thanks. I've tweaked the log and added a matching ChangeLog entry. > Testing via df on my F18 laptop, diff -u <(src/df-prev) <(src/df) > shows no difference. What do people think of this entry from > that F18 system? > > devtmpfs 15383040 1538304 0%

Re: [PATCH v2] mountlist: additional dummy FS names for Linux

2012-12-13 Thread Jim Meyering
Eric Wong wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> Eric Wong wrote: >> > * lib/mountlist.c (ME_DUMMY_0): >> > additional dummy FS names for Linux systems. >> > - "devpts" PTY slave filesystem >> > - "fusectl" control filesystem for FUSE >> > - "mqueue" enumerates POSIX message queues >> > - "rpc

Re: [PATCH v2] mountlist: additional dummy FS names for Linux

2012-12-07 Thread Eric Wong
Jim Meyering wrote: > Eric Wong wrote: > > * lib/mountlist.c (ME_DUMMY_0): > > additional dummy FS names for Linux systems. > > - "devpts" PTY slave filesystem > > - "fusectl" control filesystem for FUSE > > - "mqueue" enumerates POSIX message queues > > - "rpc_pipefs" kernel <-> userspa

Re: [PATCH v2] mountlist: additional dummy FS names for Linux

2012-12-07 Thread Jim Meyering
Eric Wong wrote: > * lib/mountlist.c (ME_DUMMY_0): > additional dummy FS names for Linux systems. > - "devpts" PTY slave filesystem > - "fusectl" control filesystem for FUSE > - "mqueue" enumerates POSIX message queues > - "rpc_pipefs" kernel <-> userspace bridge for NFS > - "sysfs" is

[PATCH v2] mountlist: additional dummy FS names for Linux

2012-12-07 Thread Eric Wong
* lib/mountlist.c (ME_DUMMY_0): additional dummy FS names for Linux systems. - "devpts" PTY slave filesystem - "fusectl" control filesystem for FUSE - "mqueue" enumerates POSIX message queues - "rpc_pipefs" kernel <-> userspace bridge for NFS - "sysfs" is for exporting kernel objects