Re: [PATCH 3/5] 64-bit obstack support, part 1

2014-10-31 Thread Alan Modra
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:52:29PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > It would be easier to review if you separated the very trivial changes from > the others. The size_t change is clearly fine and can be approved quickly. > The refactoring requires more attention. Split as requested and attached. -

Re: [PATCH 3/5] 64-bit obstack support, part 1

2014-10-31 Thread Roland McGrath
It would be easier to review if you separated the very trivial changes from the others. The size_t change is clearly fine and can be approved quickly. The refactoring requires more attention.

[PATCH 3/5] 64-bit obstack support, part 1

2014-10-28 Thread Alan Modra
a) Correct calls to alloc function, to use a size_t arg. "long" is just wrong on targets like x86_64-mingw64 where "long" is 32 bits and "size_t" 64 bits. b) Consolidate _obstack_begin and _obstack_begin1 code. * lib/obstack.h (struct obstack ): Correct prototype to use "siz