Kevin Cernekee wrote:
@@ -99,8 +99,8 @@ rpl_getdtablesize(void)
a smaller soft limit, the smaller limit is not enforced, so
we might as well just report the hard limit. */
struct rlimit lim;
- if (!getrlimit (RLIMIT_NOFILE, &lim) && lim.rlim_max != RLIM_INFINITY)
-return
* lib/getdtablesize.c: Use rlim_cur instead of rlim_max, to match
glibc behavior. test-getdtablesize and test-dup2 both assume
they will be able to create a file descriptor numbered
(getdtablesize()-1), and will fail if rlim_max > rlim_cur.
---
ChangeLog | 6 ++
lib/getdtablesize.c
