Re: [PATCH 1/2] fts: do not use the getcwdat module

On Thursday, March 22, 2018 12:12:59 AM CET Jim Meyering wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 7:44 AM, Kamil Dudka wrote: > > ... because there is no such module in gnulib > > --- > > > > lib/fts.c | 26 +- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > > > diff --

Re: [PATCH 1/2] fts: do not use the getcwdat module

On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 7:44 AM, Kamil Dudka wrote: > ... because there is no such module in gnulib > --- > lib/fts.c | 26 +- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/fts.c b/lib/fts.c > index bfa73e31e..4195f6170 100644 > --- a/lib/fts.c >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] fts: do not use the getcwdat module

Thanks, these two patches look like a good idea to me. Please give Jim a couple of days to respond before applying, though. (Are you a Gnulib member on savannah? If not, please apply to become one.) Also, please read this: https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-gnulib/2011-07/msg00355.html and mention a

[PATCH 1/2] fts: do not use the getcwdat module

... because there is no such module in gnulib --- lib/fts.c | 26 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/fts.c b/lib/fts.c index bfa73e31e..4195f6170 100644 --- a/lib/fts.c +++ b/lib/fts.c @@ -253,7 +253,6 @@ static int fts_safe_changedir