On 06/18/2011 06:15 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> James, Eric,
>> we're trying to get rid of a findutils construct:
>>
>> -#if defined SIGCLD && !defined SIGCHLD
>> -# define SIGCHLD SIGCLD
>> -#endif
>>
>> and need to know if gnulib's replacement needs to guarantee
>> this definition of SIGCHLD, or i
James, Eric,
> we're trying to get rid of a findutils construct:
>
> -#if defined SIGCLD && !defined SIGCHLD
> -# define SIGCHLD SIGCLD
> -#endif
>
> and need to know if gnulib's replacement needs to guarantee
> this definition of SIGCHLD, or if the only platforms where only SIGCLD
> existed are
[redirecting to bug-gnulib]
On 06/13/2011 05:27 PM, James Youngman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 06/11/2011 07:42 PM, James Youngman wrote:
>>> +++ b/find/find.c
> [...]
>
> Thanks for these comments. They're addressed in the patch "Assume
> SIGCHLD and O_NO
