Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add support of a dir arg of create_pipe() on OS/2 kLIBC

2024-09-16 Thread Bruno Haible
KO Myung-Hun wrote: > > - What is the point of adding wait() and waitid() in patch 1? Nothing in > > spawn-pipe.c nor wait-process.c uses wait(), waitid(). > > > > spawn-pipe.c returns a pid of a child process. If it passes to wait() > and/or waitid(), wait() and waitid() of libcx should be use

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add support of a dir arg of create_pipe() on OS/2 kLIBC

2024-09-16 Thread KO Myung-Hun
Hi/2. Bruno Haible wrote: > Hi, > > KO Myung-Hun wrote: >> These patches allow to use a directory argument of create_pipe() on >> OS/2 kLIBC. > > Four things I don't understand: > > - You still don't have posix_spawn support for this platform? > With posix_spawn working, no extra code would b

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add support of a dir arg of create_pipe() on OS/2 kLIBC

2024-09-16 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi, KO Myung-Hun wrote: > These patches allow to use a directory argument of create_pipe() on > OS/2 kLIBC. Four things I don't understand: - You still don't have posix_spawn support for this platform? With posix_spawn working, no extra code would be needed in spawn-pipe.c. Is os2-spawn.[hc]

[PATCH 0/2] Add support of a dir arg of create_pipe() on OS/2 kLIBC

2024-09-16 Thread KO Myung-Hun
Hi/2. These patches allow to use a directory argument of create_pipe() on OS/2 kLIBC. Review, please... [PATCH 1/2] wait, waitid, waitpid: Use ones from LIBCx on OS/2 kLIBC [PATCH 2/2] spawn-pipe: Support a directory argument of create_pipe()