Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 03/16/2012 02:50 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> the TABs (maybe required in glibc?)
>
> Yes, that's right. Currently I'm having problems
> getting mktime fixes back into glibc, and one of
> the issues is that we expanded tabs to spaces.
> What a hassle.
I know the pain ;-)
but
On 03/16/2012 02:50 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> the TABs (maybe required in glibc?)
Yes, that's right. Currently I'm having problems
getting mktime fixes back into glibc, and one of
the issues is that we expanded tabs to spaces.
What a hassle.
> I consider grep's choice of when to use regex vs. DF
Paul Eggert wrote:
>>> > I think we should give a "repeat count too large" error here. The regex
>>> > is being compiled to a different meaning than what the user intended.
>> Yes, definitely.
>> In testing, I noticed that we diagnose the range error
>> in the regexp path, but not in the DFA one,
>> > I think we should give a "repeat count too large" error here. The regex
>> > is being compiled to a different meaning than what the user intended.
> Yes, definitely.
> In testing, I noticed that we diagnose the range error
> in the regexp path, but not in the DFA one, but haven't
> gotten aro
