Re: [PATCH] maintainer-makefile: check for i18n setup

2010-11-12 Thread Eric Blake
On 11/12/2010 12:26 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: > Eric Blake wrote: >> * top/maint.mk (sc_bindtextdomain): Check for evidence that _() >> will likely work. >> >> I recently debugged a situation in libvirt where a program had >> not set up the i18n framework, therefore calls to _() were doing >> nothing

Re: [PATCH] maintainer-makefile: check for i18n setup

2010-11-11 Thread Jim Meyering
Eric Blake wrote: > * top/maint.mk (sc_bindtextdomain): Check for evidence that _() > will likely work. > > I recently debugged a situation in libvirt where a program had > not set up the i18n framework, therefore calls to _() were doing > nothing. If this rule had been in place, I would have quic

[PATCH] maintainer-makefile: check for i18n setup

2010-11-11 Thread Eric Blake
* top/maint.mk (sc_bindtextdomain): Check for evidence that _() will likely work. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake --- I recently debugged a situation in libvirt where a program had not set up the i18n framework, therefore calls to _() were doing nothing. If this rule had been in place, I would have q