On 11/03/11 13:50, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 03/11/2011 02:32 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>> A recent change to dd in coreutils triggered this issue,
>>> which is avoided with the attached.
>>
>>> sc_unmarked_diagnostics:
>>> @grep -nE
On 03/11/2011 02:32 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> A recent change to dd in coreutils triggered this issue,
>> which is avoided with the attached.
>
>> sc_unmarked_diagnostics:
>> @grep -nE \
>> '\> - | gr
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 11/03/11 09:32, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>> A recent change to dd in coreutils triggered this issue,
>>> which is avoided with the attached.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> I've pushed that.
>
> Cool, thanks.
> I have gnulib commit access BTW
> I had a local tweak to
On 11/03/11 09:32, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> A recent change to dd in coreutils triggered this issue,
>> which is avoided with the attached.
>
> Thanks!
> I've pushed that.
Cool, thanks.
I have gnulib commit access BTW
I had a local tweak to remove an extraneous ( in the Chang
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> A recent change to dd in coreutils triggered this issue,
> which is avoided with the attached.
Thanks!
I've pushed that.
> + maint.mk: suppress a false positive warning
> + * top/maint.mk ((sc_unmarked_diagnostics): Don't warn when
> + diagnostics are marked wit
A recent change to dd in coreutils triggered this issue,
which is avoided with the attached.
cheers,
Pádraig.
>From 3d1a414c90c49f3b4d9e427e4024f511adff154c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?P=C3=A1draig=20Brady?=
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 01:12:56 +
Subject: [PATCH] maint.mk: suppres
