Re: [PATCH] init.sh: new module, and add minimal tests of its compare function

2012-01-02 Thread Jim Meyering
Bruno Haible wrote: >> * tests/test-init.sh: New file. Hi Bruno, Thanks for the testing and the report. > This test fails on some platforms: > > On Solaris 7, HP-UX 11.00, IRIX 6.5: > > test-init.sh: failed test: err not empty: Can't open -- > FAIL: test-init.sh > > On FreeBSD 6.4: > > test-init.

Re: [PATCH] init.sh: new module, and add minimal tests of its compare function

2012-01-02 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Jim, > * tests/test-init.sh: New file. This test fails on some platforms: On Solaris 7, HP-UX 11.00, IRIX 6.5: test-init.sh: failed test: err not empty: Can't open -- FAIL: test-init.sh On FreeBSD 6.4: test-init.sh: failed test: err not empty: sed: --: No such file or directory PASS: test-

Re: [PATCH] init.sh: new module, and add minimal tests of its compare function

2011-12-23 Thread Jim Meyering
Bruno Haible wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> +License: >> +GPLed build tool > > Hmm, for me, init.sh is not a "build tool" but rather a simple piece of tests > code. I would mark it as 'GPL'. This would be consistent with what the Makes sense. I've adjusted. > documentation [1] states about the

Re: [PATCH] init.sh: new module, and add minimal tests of its compare function

2011-12-23 Thread Bruno Haible
Jim Meyering wrote: > +License: > +GPLed build tool Hmm, for me, init.sh is not a "build tool" but rather a simple piece of tests code. I would mark it as 'GPL'. This would be consistent with what the documentation [1] states about the license of test code. If this requires some change in gnulib-

Re: [PATCH] init.sh: new module, and add minimal tests of its compare function

2011-12-23 Thread Jim Meyering
Bruno Haible wrote: >> * modules/init.sh: New file. > > The module name 'init.sh' is not self-explanatory. How about one of these: > test-framework > test-frame > test-framework-sh > The latter name is because it is not impossible that someday we get also > a test framework as a C program, li

Re: [PATCH] init.sh: new module, and add minimal tests of its compare function

2011-12-22 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Jim, > * modules/init.sh: New file. The module name 'init.sh' is not self-explanatory. How about one of these: test-framework test-frame test-framework-sh The latter name is because it is not impossible that someday we get also a test framework as a C program, like glibc has one. > as a

[PATCH] init.sh: new module, and add minimal tests of its compare function

2011-12-22 Thread Jim Meyering
dependencies. >From 7d3d2d00059b7b616596f015b37e334c27212722 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 19:03:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] init.sh: new module, and add minimal tests of its compare function * modules/init.sh-tests: New file. * tests/test-init.sh: New file. * modules/init.sh: New