() Bruno Haible
() Sun, 13 Jun 2010 15:57:00 +0200
For me, it's a bit different: I don't think the number of modules
has a lot of information.
Perhaps it's just my (personal) gnulib-newbie fear...
There are some modules, like 'stdint', which provide hardly any code,
and 'regex', whi
Hi Thi,
> To me, somewhat interesting is a count of the specified modules
> (i.e., aggregate information that i am not directly aware of),
> and really interesting is the full list of "support modules"
> (non-specified dependencies). The latter because it gives me
> an idea of the project's "util
() Bruno Haible
() Fri, 2 Apr 2010 10:32:18 +0100
I apologize for the delayed response.
If you just cut randomly, you will introduce bugs in your package,
for sure.
There are two reasonable uses of '--avoid':
1) When the documentation of the modules mentions that a module
Hi Thien-Thi,
> I saw the huge list of modules
> pulled in and wondered where to start cutting (via "--avoid").
> This change to gnulib-tool helps me to do the job more quickly
> by letting me ignore (for the purposes of experimental cutting)
> the explicitly specified modules.
If you just cut ra
* gnulib-tool (func_import): For "Module list with included
dependencies", output two module lists: explicit and dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Thien-Thi Nguyen
---
Starting to use gnulib for GNU RCS, and playing with "gnulib-tool
--import strsignal". Fun stuff. I saw the huge list of modules
p
