Re: [PATCH] gettext: update macros to version 0.19

2014-07-14 Thread Daiki Ueno
Philipp Thomas writes: >> I've pushed a fix for this anyway: >> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gettext.git/commit/?h=maint&id=e1bd11a1 > > Seems the fix doesn't adapt the testsuite as I get failures in the autopoint > tests with the patch applied: > > FAIL: autopoint-2 > FAIL: autopoint-3 Yes,

Re: [PATCH] gettext: update macros to version 0.19

2014-07-14 Thread Philipp Thomas
* Daiki Ueno (u...@gnu.org) [20140713 22:51]: > I've pushed a fix for this anyway: > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gettext.git/commit/?h=maint&id=e1bd11a1 Seems the fix doesn't adapt the testsuite as I get failures in the autopoint tests with the patch applied: FAIL: autopoint-2 FAIL: autopoi

Re: [PATCH] gettext: update macros to version 0.19

2014-07-13 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 07/13/2014 09:50 PM, Daiki Ueno wrote: > Pádraig Brady writes: > >> Having realized that this update would break the continuous >> integration server also I've decided to revert for now, >> so that there is a less problematic sync point for the coreutil-8.23 release. >> We can reinstate soon w

Re: [PATCH] gettext: update macros to version 0.19

2014-07-13 Thread Daiki Ueno
Pádraig Brady writes: > Having realized that this update would break the continuous > integration server also I've decided to revert for now, > so that there is a less problematic sync point for the coreutil-8.23 release. > We can reinstate soon when the gettext 0.19 issues are sorted. Sorry for

Re: [PATCH] gettext: update macros to version 0.19

2014-07-13 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 07/13/2014 02:19 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 07/12/2014 01:53 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: >> On 07/12/2014 12:39 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: >>> On 07/11/2014 03:43 PM, Daiki Ueno wrote: Bernhard Voelker writes: > On 07/11/2014 03:13 PM, Daiki Ueno wrote: >> Could you provide an e

Re: [PATCH] gettext: update macros to version 0.19

2014-07-12 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 07/12/2014 01:53 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 07/12/2014 12:39 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: >> On 07/11/2014 03:43 PM, Daiki Ueno wrote: >>> Bernhard Voelker writes: >>> On 07/11/2014 03:13 PM, Daiki Ueno wrote: > Could you provide an example of the build failures with 0.19.1? h

Re: [PATCH] gettext: update macros to version 0.19

2014-07-12 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 07/12/2014 12:39 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 07/11/2014 03:43 PM, Daiki Ueno wrote: >> Bernhard Voelker writes: >> >>> On 07/11/2014 03:13 PM, Daiki Ueno wrote: Could you provide an example of the build failures with 0.19.1? >>> >>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/Base:

Re: [PATCH] gettext: update macros to version 0.19

2014-07-12 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 07/11/2014 03:43 PM, Daiki Ueno wrote: > Bernhard Voelker writes: > >> On 07/11/2014 03:13 PM, Daiki Ueno wrote: >>> Could you provide an example of the build failures with 0.19.1? >> >> https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/Base:System/coreutils/openSUSE_Factory/i586 >> >> [ 172s

Re: [PATCH] gettext: update macros to version 0.19

2014-07-11 Thread Daiki Ueno
Bernhard Voelker writes: > On 07/11/2014 03:13 PM, Daiki Ueno wrote: >> Could you provide an example of the build failures with 0.19.1? > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/Base:System/coreutils/openSUSE_Factory/i586 > > [ 172s] *** Error in `/usr/bin/xgettext': realloc(): inval

Re: [PATCH] gettext: update macros to version 0.19

2014-07-11 Thread Bernhard Voelker
On 07/11/2014 03:13 PM, Daiki Ueno wrote: Could you provide an example of the build failures with 0.19.1? https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/Base:System/coreutils/openSUSE_Factory/i586 [ 172s] *** Error in `/usr/bin/xgettext': realloc(): invalid pointer: 0x098f4ea8 *** [ 172s

Re: [PATCH] gettext: update macros to version 0.19

2014-07-11 Thread Philipp Thomas
* Daiki Ueno (u...@gnu.org) [20140711 15:13]: > Could you provide an example of the build failures with 0.19.1? Yes, > 0.19 had such problems[1], but with 0.19.1 we haven't received any single > bug report that affects building other packages, except this: I'll send you examples as soon as I get

Re: [PATCH] gettext: update macros to version 0.19

2014-07-11 Thread Daiki Ueno
Philipp Thomas writes: > The number of packages that failed to build with 0.19.1 was too high > to be acceptable and the person who did the update refused to resolve > the problems with the the affected packages the update was rejected. I > just requested the update again so let's see whether it

Re: [PATCH] gettext: update macros to version 0.19

2014-07-11 Thread Philipp Thomas
* Bernhard Voelker (m...@bernhard-voelker.de) [20140710 10:27]: > puh, for me as openSUSE user this means that I have to build > gettext on my hosts, as the latest release openSUSE-13.1 still > uses 0.18.3.1 (and most probably won't upgrade) It will most definitely not be updated to a newer versi

Re: [PATCH] gettext: update macros to version 0.19

2014-07-10 Thread Paul Eggert
On 07/09/2014 04:49 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: So I'm proposing the attached update for coreutils Looks good to me; thanks.

Re: [PATCH] gettext: update macros to version 0.19

2014-07-10 Thread Paul Eggert
Pádraig Brady wrote: Other have often expressed disdain for non readily available distro requiremnts like this. Should we consider reverting this until gettext-0.19 packages are easily available? The tradition in coreutils has been to use the latest stable version of the tools, and to not worr

Re: [PATCH] gettext: update macros to version 0.19

2014-07-10 Thread Bernhard Voelker
On 07/10/2014 01:49 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: [PATCH] build: sync with gnulib gettext 0.19 requirement puh, for me as openSUSE user this means that I have to build gettext on my hosts, as the latest release openSUSE-13.1 still uses 0.18.3.1 (and most probably won't upgrade), and 0.19.1 didn't ev

Re: [PATCH] gettext: update macros to version 0.19

2014-07-09 Thread Daiki Ueno
Pádraig Brady writes: > I'm not sure that removing the gettext dependencies is OK because > they're used to provide @LIB_INTL@ which was added to support solaris 2.[67] > http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=commitdiff;h=41dca647 Thanks for the pointer, I missed it. > they're used to pr

Re: [PATCH] gettext: update macros to version 0.19

2014-07-09 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 07/09/2014 08:55 PM, Paul Eggert wrote: > Pádraig Brady wrote: >> Other have often expressed disdain for non readily available >> distro requiremnts like this. Should we consider reverting >> this until gettext-0.19 packages are easily available? > > The tradition in coreutils has been to use t

Re: [PATCH] gettext: update macros to version 0.19

2014-07-09 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 07/09/2014 11:52 PM, Daiki Ueno wrote: > Pádraig Brady writes: > >> make[2]: Entering directory `/home/padraig/git/coreutils/po' >> *** error: gettext infrastructure mismatch: using a Makefile.in.in from >> gettext version 0.18 but the autoconf macros are from gettext version 0.19 >> ma

Re: [PATCH] gettext: update macros to version 0.19

2014-07-09 Thread Daiki Ueno
Pádraig Brady writes: > make[2]: Entering directory `/home/padraig/git/coreutils/po' > *** error: gettext infrastructure mismatch: using a Makefile.in.in from > gettext version 0.18 but the autoconf macros are from gettext version 0.19 > make[2]: *** [check-macro-version] Error 1 > > I can

Re: [PATCH] gettext: update macros to version 0.19

2014-07-09 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 06/11/2014 10:11 AM, Daiki Ueno wrote: > gettext-0.19 (and 0.19.1) has been released a while ago, this is the > update of the M4 macros. There's no difference between 0.19 and 0.19.1. Note this upgrades the gettext requirement for coreutils at least: $ git clone --depth=1 git://git.sv.gnu.o

Re: [PATCH] gettext: update macros to version 0.19

2014-06-11 Thread Paul Eggert
Thanks, I installed that in your name.

[PATCH] gettext: update macros to version 0.19

2014-06-11 Thread Daiki Ueno
gettext: update macros to version 0.19 * m4/intl.m4, m4/po.m4: Update from gettext-0.19. In particular, depend on gl_EXTERN_INLINE and drop support for older Bison versions. --- ChangeLog | 7 +++ m4/intl.m4 | 8 m4/po.m4 | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(