Bruno Haible writes:
> Hi Simon,
>
>> Hi. I re-read the discussion around getrandom vs gc-random and didn't
>> see any point in keeping the duplicated code. I believe the
>> getrandom-approach is better than what was in gc-gnulib.c today, so this
>> patch make it use that function. I have push
Hi Simon,
> Hi. I re-read the discussion around getrandom vs gc-random and didn't
> see any point in keeping the duplicated code. I believe the
> getrandom-approach is better than what was in gc-gnulib.c today, so this
> patch make it use that function. I have pushed the patch below.
The chang
From 44ed0db8c93f6a81fd996f1f10e93051291fbf1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon Josefsson
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 11:50:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gc-random: Replace implementation with call to getrandom.
* lib/gc-gnulib.c [GNULIB_GC_RANDOM]: Replace #include's with
those needed for getrandom.
(gc_init):
