James Youngman wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> I'm considering a rewrite of rm that uses fts.c,
>> and see that the resulting rm fails coreutils' rm/cycle test
>> because it incorrectly reports a cycle for that unusual case.
>>
>> The following patch fixes fts so th
home/james/tmp/a/file
/home/james/tmp/a
/home/james/tmp/a/file
>
> From a90d85f9e7ca8329d05bb7dd02cf807b9086b71e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jim Meyering
> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:33:09 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] fts: avoid false-positive cycle-detection
>
> * lib/fts.c (
hard, either.
>From a90d85f9e7ca8329d05bb7dd02cf807b9086b71e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:33:09 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fts: avoid false-positive cycle-detection
* lib/fts.c (fts_read): Reinitialize cycle-detection data structures
for each new command line a
