James Youngman wrote:
> I think strftime also needs to depend on ignore-value, since
> ignore-value.h is included in strftime.c. See the attached patch
> which I forgot to send at the time.
Hi James,
The sole use of ignore_value is within an #if FPRINTFTIME block, as is
the #include. Thus the fp
I think strftime also needs to depend on ignore-value, since
ignore-value.h is included in strftime.c. See the attached patch
which I forgot to send at the time.
From 5a84f1d36bbfbd1bcc1adc7c90819b82cb201768 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: James Youngman
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:17:09 +
Subjec
w, date, du --time and uptime are the only clients that
>> use fprintftime, so even if this can hide a real failure, it's not
>> *that* big a deal.
>>
>> From 119ae5514681e42839f83a4993021a222ec45daa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Jim Meyering
>> Date: We
nly clients that
> use fprintftime, so even if this can hide a real failure, it's not
> *that* big a deal.
>
> From 119ae5514681e42839f83a4993021a222ec45daa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jim Meyering
> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:24:09 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] fprintftime: avoi
x27;s not
*that* big a deal.
>From 119ae5514681e42839f83a4993021a222ec45daa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:24:09 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] fprintftime: avoid a warning about ignored fwrite return value
* lib/strftime.c [FPRINTFTIME]: Include "ignore-value
