Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Jim Meyering wrote on Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 07:42:45PM CEST:
>> Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > \> is also not a portable piece of regular expression: not in a basic
>> > regex,
>> > and not in an extended regex. It is a GNU extensio
* Jim Meyering wrote on Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 07:42:45PM CEST:
> Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > \> is also not a portable piece of regular expression: not in a basic regex,
> > and not in an extended regex. It is a GNU extension.
>
> It works with Solaris 10's grep,
> so maybe it w
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Unfortunate, but true.
>> Thanks. How about this?
>> ...
>> +grep '^[ ]*A[CM]_PROG_LIBTOOL\>' configure.ac >/dev/null \
>
> \> is also not a portable piece of regular expression: not in a basic regex,
> and not in an exte
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Unfortunate, but true.
> Thanks. How about this?
> ...
> +grep '^[ ]*A[CM]_PROG_LIBTOOL\>' configure.ac >/dev/null \
\> is also not a portable piece of regular expression: not in a basic regex,
and not in an extended regex. It is a GNU extension.
Bruno
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -grep '^[ ]*A[CM]_PROG_LIBTOOL\>' configure.ac >/dev/null ||
>> +grep -E '^[ ]*(LT_INIT|A[CM]_PROG_LIBTOOL)\>' configure.ac
>> >/dev/null ||
>
> Solaris 9 'grep' does not support the '-E' option. This is documented in the
> autoconf m
Hi Jim,
> -grep '^[ ]*A[CM]_PROG_LIBTOOL\>' configure.ac >/dev/null ||
> +grep -E '^[ ]*(LT_INIT|A[CM]_PROG_LIBTOOL)\>' configure.ac
> >/dev/null ||
Solaris 9 'grep' does not support the '-E' option. This is documented in the
autoconf manual:
Traditional `grep' implementatio
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Jim Meyering wrote on Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 01:01:14PM CEST:
>> "Debarshi Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Subject: [PATCH] bootstrap: check for AC_PROG_LIBTOOL as well as
>> >> A
* Jim Meyering wrote on Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 01:01:14PM CEST:
> "Debarshi Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Subject: [PATCH] bootstrap: check for AC_PROG_LIBTOOL as well as
> >> AM_PROG_LIBTOOL
> >> * build-aux/bootstrap: Check for AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
"Debarshi Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Subject: [PATCH] bootstrap: check for AC_PROG_LIBTOOL as well as
>> AM_PROG_LIBTOOL
>
> Wow! Thanks a lot. Will this make its way into build-aux/bootstrap of
> Gnulib as well?
That *was* for gnulib.
I'm Cc
