Hello Martin,
Your patch did a '#define _WIN32_WINNT 0x0500' in order to access the
CreateHardLink() function. This means, this function did not exist on
Windows NT 4.
Unfortunately, my mingw test system is running in a Windows NT 4 SP5
machine; this is the only version of Windows that I can use
Oops, this code does not compile on mingw:
> --- tests/test-link.c.orig2009-01-20 01:17:22.0 +0100
> +++ tests/test-link.c 2009-01-20 01:13:52.0 +0100
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>
> #include
>
> +#include
> #include
> #include
>
> @@ -36,8 +37,20 @@
> int
> main (int ar
Hello Eric, Martin,
> > Or print a message and return 77, to skip the test, if the current fs
> > doesn't support links at this point (such as FAT).
>
> I'd like to do that, but it it not easy to detect this condition. POSIX
> does not specify an error code for it, Linux uses EPERM (which can als
Hello Martin,
Thanks for the test. I committed it with minor tweaks:
- Add comments to the shell script.
- In the .c file, include . By convention, in gnulib, we
include the specification header file right after config.h. In some
situations, this allows to uncover bugs.
- In the .c f
Hello Eric!
On Mon, 19. Jan 2009, 05:57:14 -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> > The minimal test is probably to
> > - create one file,
> > - use link() to create a new name for it,
>
> Or print a message and return 77, to skip the test, if the current fs
> doesn't support links at this point (such as
Hello Bruno,
On Sun, 18. Jan 2009, 19:42:11 +0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Can you please also provide a unit test for this module?
> The minimal test is probably to
> - create one file,
> - use link() to create a new name for it,
> - then verify that the contents is the same,
> - then modif
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bruno Haible on 1/18/2009 11:42 AM:
> Hello Martin,
>
> Can you please also provide a unit test for this module?
> The minimal test is probably to
> - create one file,
> - use link() to create a new name for it,
Or print a message an
On Sun, 18. Jan 2009, 19:33:50 +0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Your patch looks quite fine. I have applied it with this ChangeLog entry
Thank you.
> - Don't initialize GNULIB_UNLINK or HAVE_UNLINK - this is unrelated.
Sorry, this was a leftover of an unrelated patch.
> - In the module descript
Hello Martin,
Can you please also provide a unit test for this module?
The minimal test is probably to
- create one file,
- use link() to create a new name for it,
- then verify that the contents is the same,
- then modify the contents of the first one,
- then verify the contents is agai
Hello,
Martin Lambers wrote:
> I'd like to suggest a new module 'link' that provides the link(2)
> function for MinGW.
Your patch looks quite fine. I have applied it with this ChangeLog entry
2009-01-18 Martin Lambers
New module 'link'.
* lib/unistd.in.h (link): New declarati
I'd like to suggest a new module 'link' that provides the link(2)
function for MinGW. The module is modelled after the existing fsync
module.
Martin
---
lib/link.c | 83 +++
lib/unistd.in.h | 17 +++
m4/link.m4 | 19
11 matches
Mail list logo
