Hi Pádraig,
2011/9/13 Pádraig Brady :
> On 09/12/2011 03:49 PM, Loďc Le Loarer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here is my latest results and patch. Please find the patches to
>> sha1.c, sha256.c and sh512.c attached and the "time" of the resulting
>> binaries in sha_benchs.log. For all binaries, in 64 and 32
On 09/12/2011 03:49 PM, Loïc Le Loarer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is my latest results and patch. Please find the patches to
> sha1.c, sha256.c and sh512.c attached and the "time" of the resulting
> binaries in sha_benchs.log. For all binaries, in 64 and 32 bits modes
> (.m32), I run 3 times the comman
Hi,
In fact, I have access to a Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz, which is much
slower in fact so I have replaced the 1G zero bytes by 100M zero
bytes, and tested only the 32 bit binaries of course and you can find
the results attached.
It seems that the impact of my patches are much more convincing on
t
Hi,
Here is my latest results and patch. Please find the patches to
sha1.c, sha256.c and sh512.c attached and the "time" of the resulting
binaries in sha_benchs.log. For all binaries, in 64 and 32 bits modes
(.m32), I run 3 times the command "\time sha*sum zero1G" where zero1G
is a 10^9 bytes file
