Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] git-merge-changelog and "lumped" ChangeLog entries

2010-07-19 Thread Stefano Lattarini
At Sunday 18 July 2010, Bruno Haible wrote: > Hello Stafano, > > Thanks for the suggestion. Eric Blake already suggested the same > thing. It is planned that in a month or so, the > git-merge-changelog is merged to a project of its own, then > receives a test suite, and then we'll start to add more

Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] git-merge-changelog and "lumped" ChangeLog entries

2010-07-18 Thread Bruno Haible
Hello Stafano, > Some projects (like Automake) have the policy of keeping multiple > ChangeLog entries having the same author and date lumped togheter, > preferring e.g.: > > 2000-01-01 Foo Bar > > Add foo > > Add bar > > over: > > 2000-01-01 Foo Bar > > Add foo

[FEATURE REQUEST] git-merge-changelog and "lumped" ChangeLog entries

2010-07-15 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hello gnulibers. Some projects (like Automake) have the policy of keeping multiple ChangeLog entries having the same author and date lumped togheter, preferring e.g.: 2000-01-01 Foo Bar Add foo Add bar over: 2000-01-01 Foo Bar Add foo 2000-01-01 Foo Ba