Alan Modra wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:13:29PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > I'm wondering now what the best way to fix this would be. I'm a little bit
> > confused about the original intentions of the test, however. Why does it
> > attempt to move
trust the
gl_BIGENDIAN macro instead?
Or should the test simply hardcode the information about the IBM double
double format, and treat the first half as 64-bit IEEE double?
I'd be happy to come up with a patch, but I'd appreciate some guidance what
direction it should take.
Mit freundlich
