Re: pkgsrc m4 patches

2021-06-28 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 02:21:47AM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote: > [CCing bug-gnulib. We work in public; please avoid private email if > there is a mailing list.] Sorry, I'll keep that in mind. > Thomas Klausner wrote: > > Hi Bruno! > > > > I just updated m4 in pkg

Re: parse-datetime test failure on NetBSD

2021-03-14 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 11:42:43AM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > > The recipe from that bug report fails for me on NetBSD 9.99.81/amd64 > > with gcc 9.3.0: > > With version of Bison are you using? 3.7.5 Thomas

parse-datetime test failure on NetBSD

2021-03-14 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! I reported a bug in gnutls 3.7.1 https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/issues/1190#note_528802421 and was told it might be a bug in gnulib instead. The recipe from that bug report fails for me on NetBSD 9.99.81/amd64 with gcc 9.3.0: git clone --depth=1 https://git.sv.gnu.org/git/gnulib.git cd

Re: signal.in.h patch for DragonFly

2017-03-15 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 05:10:31PM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote: > Thomas Klausner wrote: > > The attached patch adds DragonFly support to lib/signal.in.h, please apply > > it. > > The comment says that this include of is there to make sure that > declares pthr

signal.in.h patch for DragonFly

2017-03-15 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! When sending a patch to guile, they told me that the file comes from gnulib and I should file the bug report there, so here it is. The attached patch adds DragonFly support to lib/signal.in.h, please apply it. Thanks, Thomas $NetBSD: patch-lib_signal.in.h,v 1.1 2016/12/03 03:15:33 marino Ex

Re: Fwd: Building m4 fails under Interix-3.5

2008-10-24 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 02:23:03AM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote: > But in this case, there is a cheap workaround that I can apply even without > testing. That indeed fixes the problem, reports Aleksey. Thanks! Thomas

Re: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12

2008-09-21 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 06:53:49AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > I'm committing this. It looks like your flavor of NetBSD now handles > denormals, but still fails on negative zero. I asked around a bit -- this was a regression. NetBSD has two versions of this code around, and recently switched back

Re: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12

2008-08-23 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 10:06:29AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > Expected; use './configure --enable-changeword' if you want that feature > enabled in m4, with the caveat that it will be withdrawn in m4 2.0 (in > favor of a more powerful and faster changesyntax feature). Ok, I'll leave it disabled th

Re: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12

2008-08-23 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi again! Btw, did I mention last time that m4 tests work, but skip a few? Skipped checks were: ./114.changeword ./115.changeword ./116.changeword ./117.changeword ./118.chan geword ./119.changeword All checks successful > According to Thomas Klausner on 8/14/2008 1:21 PM: > > One f

Re: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12

2008-08-14 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 07:37:47AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > I have released a new snapshot from branch-1.4, and hope to release it as > M4 1.4.12 in the near future. This should fix many of the complaints > about strtod and other test failures that were reported against 1.4.11. > However, it als

Re: m4-1.4.11: assert failure in two self tests on NetBSD

2008-04-12 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi Bruno! Thanks for the quick reply! On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 07:33:14PM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote: > Hi, > > Thomas Klausner reported: > > | m4-1.4.11 fails two selftests on NetBSD-4.99.48/amd64. > > | The first one is in test-frexpl: > > | > > | # gdb test-

Re: m4-1.4.11: assert failure in two self tests on NetBSD

2008-04-11 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi Eric! Thanks for your reply. > Both of these failures are in the gnulib tests, hence I'm adding > bug-gnulib. Could you please also run 'make -k check' to see if the > M4-specific tests pass? Sure. Skipped checks were: ./109.changeword ./110.changeword ./111.changeword ./112.changeword .

Re: 2 test failures for m4-1.4.10 on NetBSD

2007-07-20 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 06:16:22PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > According to Thomas Klausner on 7/19/2007 4:07 PM: > > Hi! > > > > I just tried the self tests of m4-1.4.10 on NetBSD-4.99.23/amd64. > > Two failed: > > test-frexpl.c:167: assertion failed > >