On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
>> Should gnulib generate .pot and maintain its own translations?
>
> That's been proposed, yes, but nobody's gotten around to doing
> it.
I take it that the project is not against to such changes if someone does it.
> Translators have to deal w
Hi,
I see gnulib use gettext(), but it does not setup its own domain,
which means it'll use the main program's domain. I don't see how this
works because then every program that uses gnulib must run xgettext on
gnulib source code, then translators may have to translat the same
strings over again f
