Is this patch necessary? The elements of the structure are initialized
prior to the return statement.
Since the `i`, `j`, and `count` are not really used, I feel like the SAST
report I've sent can be marked as a false positive.
Do you agree?
On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 7:17 AM Paul Eggert wrote:
>
Hi,
I'm analyzing the results of SAST reports (combination of
coverity,snyk,cppcheck,gcc,clang,shellcheck,unicontrol), and from 20
findings I identified a few that might be a true positive.
However, I would like to ask you for the help to resolve it, as I'm
not 100% aware of the code internals.
