Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 12:04 -0500, Robert Dewar wrote: > Duncan Sands wrote: > > > The C front-end performs this transformation too. I'm not claiming that the > > back-end optimizers would actually do something sensible if the front-end > > didn't transform this code (in fact they don't seem too)

Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 22:27 -0500, Richard Kenner wrote: > > I don't think -frisky is a good name for that option. A better name > > would be -fstrict. > > Or -pedantic? ;-) -pedantic-codegen :) Laurent