Do not look at the last message I sent you.

My account was hacked, the previous message that was sent to you will take you to a fake gmail login. If you enter your password into that login, it will hack your account and send a similar messages to all of your contacts (a.k.a. everyone who you have ever emailed or gotten email from). DO NOT

[PATCH] valgrind-tests: fixed misleading help message

files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index 13ea1a8..b9a4501 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +2014-05-30 Kieran Colford + + valgrind-tests: fixed misleading help message + The help message generated by a configure s

Re: [PATCH] valgrind-tests: fixed misleading help message.

On 14-05-30 06:59 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 05/28/2014 04:53 PM, Kieran Colford wrote: >> The help message generated by a configure script using this module >> implied that valgrind was disabled by default, which it wasn't. >> Patched so that valgrind is in fact d

[PATCH] valgrind-tests: fixed misleading help message.

files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index d76591a..25bfed0 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +2014-05-28 Kieran Colford + + valgrind-tests: fixed misleading help message. + The help message generated by a conf

[PATCH] valgrind-tests: fixed misleading help message.

files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index fc8a081..f2ccae0 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +2014-05-28 Kieran Colford + + valgrind-tests: fixed misleading help message. + The help message generated by a configure s

[PATCH] stringops: add new module

/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +2014-05-25 Kieran Colford + + stringops: add new module + maint.mk has long had a syntax-check rule that requests that users use + STREQ (a, b) instead of open-coding (strcmp (a, b) == 0); but nothing in + gnulib actually provided that macro

Re: [PATCH] Added a module stringops that provides STREQ and STRNEQ

On 14-05-22 12:54 AM, Paul Eggert wrote: > Kieran Colford wrote: >> I deliberately chose to use it as a macro and call it this because that >> is how it is done everywhere else in gnulib. > > Sure, but let's take this opportunity to do a better API, while we're &

[PATCH] stringops: add new module

@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +2014-05-22 Kieran Colford + + stringops: add new module + maint.mk has long had a syntax-check rule that requests that users use + STREQ (a, b) instead of open-coding (strcmp (a, b) == 0); but nothing in + gnulib actually provided that macro. This adds a

Re: [PATCH] Added a module stringops that provides STREQ and STRNEQ

On 14-05-22 12:28 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 05/21/2014 10:14 PM, Paul Eggert wrote: >> Kieran Colford wrote: >>> +#define STRNEQ(X, Y) (strcmp (X, Y) != 0) >> >> 1. This name is poorly chosen (it looks too much like "strncmp", which >> means somethin

[PATCH] Added a module stringops that provides STREQ and STRNEQ

PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + GNU General Public License for more details. + + You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License + along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */ + +/* Written by Kieran Colford. */ + +#ifndef _GL_STRINGOPS_H +#

[PATCH] A new module called streq_macros that provides STREQ and STRNEQ

[test if X and Y are not NULL and are equal]) +AC_DEFINE([STRNEQ(X, Y)], [((X) != NULL && (Y) != NULL && strcmp (X, Y) != 0)], + [test if X and Y are not NULL and are not equal]) + +Makefile.am: + +Include: + +License: +LGPL + +Maintainer: +Kieran Colford -- 1.7.9.5

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Removed sc_prohibit_strcmp from the syntax-check

On 14-05-21 02:48 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 05/21/2014 12:00 PM, Kieran Colford wrote: >> With the removal of STREQ and STRNEQ from gnulib, this syntax test is >> no longer useful and simply generates a nuisance error message that >> can't be fixed by gnulib. > >

[PATCH 2/2] Removed sc_prohibit_strcmp from the syntax-check

With the removal of STREQ and STRNEQ from gnulib, this syntax test is no longer useful and simply generates a nuisance error message that can't be fixed by gnulib. --- top/maint.mk |8 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/top/maint.mk b/top/maint.mk index b6cd5a2..5b345ad 1006

[PATCH] Added the core dumps signals to the list of caught signals.

It is not mentioned anywhere why the signals which generate core dumps are ignored by this module even though they are equally fatal to the process. The only speculated reason for this is that the cleanup routine my alter the state of the running process, making the core dump difficult to use in d