On Do, 2016-06-02 at 15:01 -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 06/02/2016 02:26 PM, David Seifert wrote:
> >
> > We could relax the whole thing a bit, and maybe just make a plain
> > __cplusplus check, without a version number. This keeps the C side
> > as
> > it
On Do, 2016-06-02 at 15:01 -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 06/02/2016 02:26 PM, David Seifert wrote:
> >
> > We could relax the whole thing a bit, and maybe just make a plain
> > __cplusplus check, without a version number. This keeps the C side
> > as
> > it
On Mi, 2016-06-01 at 11:22 -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 06/01/2016 01:29 AM, David Seifert wrote:
> >
> > stdbool.m4 is supposed to merely check that
> > stdbool.h fulfills C99 requirements. Why does it then necessarily
> > check whether bool is a
> > define
On 31 May 2016, at 18:07, Paul Eggert wrote:On 05/31/2016 12:33 AM, David Seifert wrote:configure.ac:AC_INITAC_PROG_CXXm4_include([stdbool.m4])AC_LANG_PUSH([C++])AC_CHECK_HEADER_STDBOOLThanks for the example. I installed your patch into gnulib. But I don't see how it can work wi
p 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Seifert
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 22:54:32 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Amend AC_CHECK_HEADER_STDBOOL for C++11 and modern dialects
---
m4/stdbool.m4 | 39 +--
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/m4/stdbo
