On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> For what it's worth, argp uses `Report bugs to
> .', i.e. no package name.
>
My 2 cents for the sake of clarity: argp doesn't add the enclosing `<' '>'.
Ben
Hi folks,
Argp doesn't protect the user from picking short options that
interfere with argp's getopt implementation.
I apologize in advance for any line-splitting that gmail does to this message.
Consider the options in the following program:
$ ./bug1 --help
Usage: bug1 [OPTION...]
-+, --plu
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Karl Berry wrote:
>The <...> markup is helpful when the URL is broken into two lines,
>
Let's not forget about argp. Here's a patch to sync it to the new
format. Unfortunately it will require users of
argp_program_bug_address who used enclosing '<', '>' to c
amble with gmail's word-wrapping.
cheers,
Ben
From 3f3f0ba1d1f14bfeba26020ddbfcefe52d82b370 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Asselstine
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:27:58 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] 2009-01-18 Ben Asselstine
getusershell: new function: set_shells_file; new header:
